Yoko Ono - Part 1 | The Unsung Heroine of Instruction Art Discovered in London’ Tate Modern

Yoko Ono - Part 1 | The Unsung Heroine of Instruction Art Discovered in London’ Tate Modern

Was Yoko Ono a conceptual artist before she hit the mainstream by falling in love with one of the most famous men on the planet in the 1960s? So, what was dedicated art lover Emily Harding’s knowledge of her work, prior to this survey show at Tate Modern? And, for that matter, how much did art curator and writer Joana P. R. Neves know about this unsung hero of conceptualism and instruction art?

Did you enjoy the episode? Think about supporting Exhibitionistas by leaving a small donation: https://buymeacoffee.com/exhibitionista

Joana and Emily do an exhibition walkthrough in Music for the Mind, a historic exhibition of Yoko Ono’s art, where interactive art installations drew a flow of crowds. 

Sign up for a tiered monthly support: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2624749/monetization/supporter_settings Your contribution keeps us going.

Joana and Emily also provide art student resources via a thorough introduction of the contemporary artist they focus on along with art banter, meditative explorations, and, often, feminist perspectives on histories often built through the obligatory male gaze.

Expect: a colourful artist biography; art history musings; art theory and art language dissected or used in accessible ways; art wonderment in buckets; international art; thoughts on curatorial work; and art etiquette challenges…

Music for the Mind, a Yoko Ono retrospective exhibition curated by Juliet Bingham and Patrizia Dander, on show at Tate Modern until September 1rst 2024. It was organized by Tate Modern and Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfallen. https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/yoko-ono 

Instagram: @yokoono 


Music: Sarturn. 

Did the episode stir Art Wonderment memories? Share them via text or voice message.

Support the show

Created & Hosted by Dr. Joana P. R. Neves, art curator and writer with over 20 years of experience in the contemporary art field. Artistic director of Drawing Now Paris since 2018, she has worked across the industry, from the art market to education. She co-launched the art residency and project space Worlding in 2020. Exhibitionistas’ first year offered exhibition discussions with guest co-host Emily Harding; organically, it grew into a more experimental show exploring art topics, stories and interviews complemented by Joana’s publication Art Thinkosaurus on Substack. She champions ‘Art Wonderment’s’ embrace of complexity against the lure of ready-made opinions. A polyglot, she grew up in Lisbon, studied and lived in Paris, to finally settle in London with her artist husband, four children and two cats. 

Find us:

On Instagram – @exhibitionistas_podcast

On Substack (NEWSLETTER: sign up!): Art Thinkosaurus > Exhibitionistas Files

Online: www.exhibitionistaspodcast.com

Do you want to be a guest on Art Etiquette? Reach out: joana@exhibitionistaspodcast.com

Copyright: Joana P. R. Neves, 2024.

[00:00:00] This episode is the first of two dedicated to Yoko Ono's exhibition, Music of the Mind

[00:00:26] at Tate Modern. By the way, this exhibition is organised by Tate Modern in London in collaboration

[00:00:33] with Kunst Samling Nordheim Vesfalen in Dusselville. So we decided to extend our usual time allocated

[00:00:42] to exhibitions which is one episode because Yoko Ono is one of the most overlooked and yet

[00:00:47] pivotal artists of the second half of the 20th century. Personally I find that she helps

[00:00:54] us understand conceptualism, a type of art we sort of lost contact with and remain oblivious

[00:00:59] to in many ways because she's not enamored with it. She uses it for connectivity and

[00:01:06] togetherness. She understands its time-based nature or rather she helped create it because

[00:01:12] she wanted so to be a concert pianist or a composer but ultimately she became Yoko Ono,

[00:01:20] one of the first women to navigate male spaces in contemporary art and music. She is a woman

[00:01:27] of firsts and the first thing she was confronted with was constantly being an outsider. Her

[00:01:33] family was Catholic but incredibly interested in classical Japanese art while also dedicating

[00:01:40] a lot of time to jazz her father and painting, her mother and her aunt Anna Bupnova and

[00:01:47] her sister Vivara Bupnova introduced constructivism in Japan. They came straight from Russia.

[00:01:54] She was the first woman to enroll in a philosophy course in Japan and she was the first person

[00:01:59] to publish a book of instruction art, grapefruit, in 1964. This was before Solowit would produce

[00:02:07] his first wall drawing at Policube Gallery in 1968 and thus embark on an instruction-based

[00:02:13] form of drawing in relation with architecture. My point here is that it doesn't really matter

[00:02:19] who did what first but it is important not to obliterate the role female but also queer

[00:02:25] native or non-binary artists played. For instance personally I knew of grapefruit much later than

[00:02:32] I knew of Lawrence Vinnner, Joseph Kassout and Solowit's writing about conceptual art. I was

[00:02:38] astounded by the poetic quality and impossibility of some of the instructions and how to revise

[00:02:44] my idea of instruction art. When in fact her instructions were connected with a notion

[00:02:49] of musical schools and poetry, it also allowed me to understand one of the statements by Solowit

[00:02:56] saying that quote, conceptual artists are mystics rather than rationalists. They leap

[00:03:03] to conclusions that logic cannot reach. Rational judgments repeat rational judgments. Irrational

[00:03:12] judgments lead to new experience. So these were his, well the three first sentences of his

[00:03:19] sentences of conceptual art published in 1969. King Leia says it, nothing comes from nothing

[00:03:27] an art feeds off of other art in a complex way that is irreducible to the sterile notion

[00:03:33] of influence. We create together and we create in our time and we also resonate with other

[00:03:40] former times and perhaps even with the future. So in this episode we start by chatting about

[00:03:47] Yoko Ono's persona, what is said about her and the difficulties she faced as a Japanese woman

[00:03:53] in the state of the Pearl Harbor but also as a US-based avant-garde artist going back in the 60s

[00:04:01] to an experimental and high-achieving Japanese art scene. Yoko Ono's two-fust-entrucsion pieces

[00:04:08] are mentioned and it is exciting to see how music driven they were while simultaneously

[00:04:13] creating a sort of happening with performance right at the beginning of the 1950s. We stop

[00:04:20] more or less in 1962 so much has left to say about Yoko Ono's career as an artist and

[00:04:27] the exhibition itself in our second episode. So let's not waste any more time without further

[00:04:35] ado, let's dig in. Enjoy!

[00:04:57] Hello and welcome again to our humble podcast about artists seen through their exhibitions.

[00:05:15] With me, Joanna Pia Nevers and my lovely co-hosts. We are devoted to this format of the exhibition

[00:05:22] because it allows for an experience you literally cannot have anywhere else. It can be

[00:05:27] uncomfortable, emotional, rigorous, chaotic, powerful and I think the exhibition we are about

[00:05:36] to explore is a very good example of it but it will always be challenging, good challenging.

[00:05:43] That's why we have to talk about these exhibitions for you, Alessna, to go on a journey with

[00:05:48] us where we will not shy away from questions both very dumb and hopefully a bit deep as

[00:05:53] well. Comments and anecdotes. I am said lovely co-hosts, Emily Harding thanks for that

[00:06:00] Joanna in art lover and an exhibition goer and it's true exhibitions are that once

[00:06:07] in a lifetime kind of moment and they're different every time you go even if you're going

[00:06:11] to the same one so it's a really great way to experience art and have a great chat about

[00:06:19] it. But first what was your weekly culture like Joanna? Well, as you know my week was culture

[00:06:27] so this was my big week of the year where we opened and closed the Drawing Now Art Fair

[00:06:34] Week so I am the artistic director of Drawing Now Art Fair and so we had lots of artists,

[00:06:40] galleries, talks, two exhibitions and it was absolutely delightful. The week has been about drawing

[00:06:48] which was absolutely fantastic. We had the exhibition of Suzanne Uski so Suzanne won the prize

[00:06:56] the Drawing Now Art Fair Prize last year so one of the great advantages of that prize is that

[00:07:02] you get an exhibition at the Drawing Lab the year after during the fair so I visited her exhibition

[00:07:09] and it was absolutely lovely. It was a sort of scientific style drawing an exploration or a

[00:07:17] comment on the scientific drawing and she dedicated the exhibition to bevers and their impact on

[00:07:24] the ecosystem but also the impacts of agriculture on their ecosystem so that was incredibly

[00:07:32] powerful. Yeah, very interesting I learned a lot so from the 12th century onwards we basically

[00:07:39] destroyed the ecosystem that the beavers were building because they wilds. They create forests

[00:07:44] around them and they also have an impact on the water and so they kind of create these very

[00:07:50] damp moist ecosystems and then everything grows around them and from the 12th century or

[00:07:56] onward we completely destroyed that. I mean in the UK they're starting to reintroduce them

[00:08:01] actually into the wild. Ealing here where I live yeah they just reintroduced beavers and I love

[00:08:09] beavers, I was so excited because everyone sent me the post on Instagram because it's just thank you

[00:08:15] Suzanne Uski was incredible Suzanne Huski without the accent was incredible to she's a French artist

[00:08:23] to see the exhibition was really lovely and then I'm also excited to say that we unveiled

[00:08:29] the winner of the prize this year and it's the Polish artist Tatiana Wolska. I'm very happy about

[00:08:37] that but I have to say that this year we had a great lineup of only women so five women including

[00:08:43] a cartoonist Catherine Mouris who is the only survivor of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack I don't

[00:08:50] know if you remember that she was late. Oh my god and she once you arrive there you know everything

[00:08:57] was called and off and you know they were there and yeah it was quite quite a big thing for her but

[00:09:02] she is an incredible artist in her own terms there was also a great friend who's a terrific artist

[00:09:09] Marine Pagès I mean anyone could have won the prize to be very honest prizes are strange

[00:09:14] and I also finally was so so delighted to work with Inji Evina who's this great Turkish artist

[00:09:23] had a solo show at the Mison La Creture Damna through our partnership with the Fracti Cardi

[00:09:30] which is the only collection in the fract which are regional art funds in every region of France

[00:09:36] that is dedicated to contemporary drawing and through this partnership we did an exhibition there

[00:09:42] and Inji is an incredible artist she's in her 60s and she has an amazing journey into arts

[00:09:49] and she represented Turkey at the 2019 Venice Biennial it was an honor to work with her it was so

[00:09:57] impactful it was really really fantastic so yeah my week was culture it was very very tiring by

[00:10:03] the way I have to say for our listeners sake because they're probably thinking something changed

[00:10:09] about their voices yeah we are ill you and I we're very sick after drawing now I always get sick

[00:10:17] but this time it was it's quite it's been quite a week and for youtube I'm like oh my gosh yeah

[00:10:25] totally which is why my week in culture has been television but before before before before

[00:10:33] we do that I mean so if people are interested in drawing now how do they find out more about drawing

[00:10:41] oh yeah that's a very good question so we have a website so bear in mind it is an art fair so it

[00:10:49] is like any other art fair like trees but it is specifically about drawing in an expanded sense you

[00:10:56] can find ceramics you can find videos animations also drawings on paper so we are an event

[00:11:03] a yearly event always the last week of March every year in Paris at the Carrodjou Tomp

[00:11:11] and we also do round tables we always curate one exhibition at least at least one in the in the space

[00:11:19] of the Carrodjou Tomp and it's an opportunity to travel worldwide while being in a very small

[00:11:27] space with 73 galleries from all over the world who are presenting what their artists do best

[00:11:35] and like cutting edge contemporary drawing so that's where you can find us at the Carrodjou Tomp

[00:11:41] or explore our website we have a youtube channel as well drawing now art fair where you have

[00:11:46] all the talks we've done since the beginning artist interviews it's really really interesting

[00:11:52] yeah it is really cool and I mean are there that many forums that focus on drawing?

[00:11:59] well not really to be very fair the first ever drawing art fair was the Salon du Descent which

[00:12:09] is which happens at the same time as us and they've existed for 50 years I think so a long

[00:12:16] long time but they focus on old masters and until modernism so we are the only art fair that

[00:12:25] really is dedicated to contemporary drawing and then after us so we've we've existed for 17 years

[00:12:32] I've been working as an artistic director there since 2018 and now there are other art fairs

[00:12:40] dedicated to drawing like art on paper and Brussels paper positions in Germany and Switzerland

[00:12:47] there are other art fairs we are the bigger sorry this is really we are we'll be able to

[00:12:55] I am going to put it out there we are the biggest we are a human sized art fair because we only have

[00:13:03] about 73 galleries our Brussels which is in a few weeks has 175 galleries so we're quite small

[00:13:12] but big enough for people to spend three days with us like people where I think we're one of the

[00:13:18] only art fairs where people come and go and they come on the first day they come on the second day

[00:13:23] then they come during the weekend with some friends it really is a meeting point because

[00:13:28] it is dedicated to a medium now amazing brilliant wow I feel like I'm being I was interviewed quite a

[00:13:35] lot the last week and the weeks before if you like I'm doing the final interview but thank you

[00:13:43] Emily for letting me plug my my art fair yeah totally no it's so impressive and yeah I mean I

[00:13:51] I haven't been but one day Joanna one day I shall make it Emily in 2025 we'll we'll we'll hook you up

[00:14:00] amazing um so yeah so my weekend culture what did you do laid on the sofa? What did you do

[00:14:08] and did a whole lot of nothing I coughed I sneezed I blew my nose

[00:14:15] your nose yeah and then had to put like chapstick on my nose because it was so worn down from all of it

[00:14:23] four thing I'm not there yet I'm not there yet I'll get the the Kleenex with the alo that's the way to go

[00:14:32] oh sponsor us please yeah exactly Kleenex with balsam they're just tender on the nose and just exactly

[00:14:41] what you need when you have a cold yeah and we you won't need chapstick after a while I mean

[00:14:48] I still did I gotta say I still did have to put a little dab on there but um now now now there goes

[00:14:55] the sponsoring yeah so yeah so I later on in the sofa and watched a lot of television Atlanta have

[00:15:02] you seen Atlanta I have not and I loved Donald Glover so I need to do not get on

[00:15:10] would you not love Donald Glover so yeah so Atlanta is the one that he did before that I don't know

[00:15:15] there's four seasons of it and I don't know if if they're making it all right it might be done

[00:15:20] what's it about it's unlike that's the thing Joanna is it's tough to say what it's about so it's

[00:15:27] not plot driven okay I'm curious in the first episode it's about a rapper and that's a me then

[00:15:33] Atlanta it's about a rapper in Atlanta broadly and his crew is you know kind of his family

[00:15:40] and friends and I mean that's the very broad context for it in the first episode there's a shooting

[00:15:48] and he think oh wow it's gonna it's like the shooting is never talked about it like it is not about

[00:15:55] that you know it's like right in the first episode it's like we're gonna do this and you're gonna

[00:16:00] think it's gonna like the consequences of this big event that happens in the first season is

[00:16:05] gonna be what this is about guess what it's not you know so it's not plot driven there aren't like

[00:16:10] huge character arcs there's some people progress and things happen and choices are made but it's

[00:16:17] not about that even the main cast doesn't appear in every episode there are episodes that have nothing

[00:16:24] to do with the main characters but it still works so it's about a lot of things but race is a

[00:16:31] central feature it's a show that for me I just didn't feel like it was trying to convince me of

[00:16:37] anything about race it wasn't trying to moralize about race although it certainly you know would

[00:16:45] have license to for sure but it's just like presenting realities and ideas that welcomes a viewer in

[00:16:53] to be like huh right it's unapologetically what it is is almost makes it feel like it is something

[00:17:01] that's trying to do something to you but it does it in such a light way like it's holding it all

[00:17:09] so lightly and if you haven't seen community community he was an actor on that show he wasn't a

[00:17:16] creator yes yes on that show but that show has a has a lot of magical realism in there and just

[00:17:24] absurd tangents of and Atlanta has that too I mean parts of it are very real you know kind of in

[00:17:32] this these people's lives but a lot of it is sort of reality adjacent and kind of slips things

[00:17:41] in that way in a very very clever and imaginative way but yeah it's so good it's so I mean you must

[00:17:49] must check it I'm gonna put this on the must list it's making me think of beef I loved beef

[00:17:55] and the tension the kind of eroticism of really hating someone is so well explored because

[00:18:04] they really hate each other there's no like because at a certain point I thought this was going to

[00:18:08] go in the direction of them finally loving each other but no no they hate each other from beginning

[00:18:16] to end because they're from opposing social drives and and economic drives and conflict is such a

[00:18:25] timely thing to be talking about cool so in the vein of conflict we could just give

[00:18:32] peace of choice and oh well done good to like or was that a segue of segues yeah so um yeah we

[00:18:43] could imagine peace and yeah talk about the exhibition for Elizabeth's yes we haven't unveiled

[00:18:50] the name of the artist yet although it is the name of the episode so it will come as no surprise

[00:18:56] we will be talking about the Japanese American artist yoga oh no she's a person of contrast

[00:19:02] she is very self-presessed I mean one of the most self-presessed women of the 50s and 60s

[00:19:09] it brings kind of Hillary Clinton to mind it's like you know someone who is you know has that

[00:19:14] self-possession and is hated for it you know I mean and it's hated she hated for it she had that

[00:19:21] times 10 plus she was Japanese on top of it you know so yeah she's incredible yeah like totally

[00:19:28] self-presessed yeah very self-presessed but also self-effacing and not in a submissive way so

[00:19:36] the fact that she's self-effacing is because for her there's nothing more important than art

[00:19:43] and that's it it's not the authorship it's not the artist who are behind the art art is the most

[00:19:49] important thing for her and what's really striking is that in the catalog and the catalog of

[00:19:55] the exhibition which is called a music of the mind by the way it's really well done the catalog's

[00:20:01] really good and you can see lots of photographs of her in the exhibition in the catalog and she's

[00:20:09] always opaque that she has this aura of unpenetrability you cannot know she's just standing there

[00:20:20] for the sake of the art so it's really tricky to do some research about her and not engage with

[00:20:30] the personas that were created for her but because for lots of people she's the person who broke up

[00:20:35] the Beatles which is absolutely true it's totally not true yeah it's so interesting because that

[00:20:40] is the over you know from an American perspective I don't know maybe others as well it's like

[00:20:45] that is the overriding narrative about her and you know it's like a new friend of mine

[00:20:52] grew up in the States from when he was 11 but is not from there and he was like yeah when I was

[00:20:58] a kid you know love the Beatles and that was you know that was what I thought of her like

[00:21:02] Buu Yoko Oh no because she broke up the Beatles and you know he's not white and he's like and now

[00:21:08] looking at it and it's like that was so racist you know it's like but I totally didn't see it at

[00:21:13] the time because I was just you know absolutely blinded by the pervasiveness of this theory

[00:21:22] and it's just and a misogyny not true yeah totally racism it's ugly all of it and now she's got

[00:21:30] the whole cocktail yeah yeah and now he's like it just can't even believe I you know signed up to that

[00:21:37] but you felt for that yeah but that was the culture because along alongside that she's also

[00:21:45] the most notorious Japanese female celebrity of the 60s the 70s and the 80s so she was known

[00:21:52] for being an eccentric in the best case scenario honestly like this was the best thing you could say

[00:21:58] about her or a vicious hag or which she was called the witch in the press it's just this is not

[00:22:05] things that people would shout at her because they would shout chink like that's the thing she got

[00:22:09] in the UK and in America so not even kind of realizing why exactly she came from but she was in

[00:22:16] the press she was called the witch yeah you can go back I watched this Joan Rivers episode where

[00:22:24] she interviewed people who worked with her as assistants including Amy Peng who just released

[00:22:32] a documentary about her week with John Lennon which was not a weekend which was not a week one

[00:22:37] and what's much more than that and the way they talk about her they even talk about the fact

[00:22:43] that she wanted to eat her own placenta when she had her child which is something that everybody

[00:22:49] does now you freeze your placenta you turn it into pills and it's apparently really good for your

[00:22:54] health but she that was the witchy thing like she was a witch she wanted to eat her placenta which

[00:23:02] is something that now everyone is talking about and there's like a very big um phenomenon of women

[00:23:11] and even doctors suggesting to just keep the placenta and turn it into pills or you know whatever

[00:23:16] put it in food I haven't done that yeah but it is a thing and it's taken seriously now for many

[00:23:25] people but of course she was a witch because she wanted to and they were releasing like really

[00:23:32] private things about her life as if it was a given because she was not a person yeah she was

[00:23:38] she's a witch for her yeah exactly and an old woman so a witch yeah and I the in the

[00:23:45] upper grabs in the exhibition they have listening booths where you can hear some of her recordings

[00:23:51] and music and there was a piece of music that it was a live show and she was talking before

[00:23:57] this song began and she said something to the effect of you know when I first got here I was a

[00:24:04] bitch and that's who I was I was this bitch who broke up the Beatles and now I've graduated to a witch

[00:24:12] and she's like so now I have way more power you know and she was just having she said that and

[00:24:19] I think about yeah I mean but I mean there was so many recordings right it's like that just

[00:24:25] happened yeah yeah the exhibition was full of stuff yeah I'm gonna go back anyway but um it's

[00:24:32] funny because the other day so my son my queer son uses the word bitch a lot which is obviously

[00:24:38] something that you know gay men or bisexual men do and I keep telling him you know that doesn't

[00:24:44] sit well with me that much I don't claim I don't reclaim that word I was looking at him I was like

[00:24:51] anyway we need we need witches not bitches and now my daughter was there and she's like oh I'm gonna

[00:24:57] I'm gonna get that but actually Yoko Ono did it first which I think is something we're gonna say a lot

[00:25:03] in this episode Yoko Ono did it first and you know I'm not very tempted by these first

[00:25:09] isms of art history but I think with Yoko Ono is so blatant that she was so she was the avant-garde

[00:25:17] of the avant-garde but not only her also Japan Japanese avant-garde was way more interesting

[00:25:25] than the the American avant-garde in the in the 60s in the beginning of the 60s yeah it was more

[00:25:31] at the end of the 60s and beginning of the 70s that things really developed in America and in Japan

[00:25:37] my gosh you know so many things were happening anyway I just want to address also this thing

[00:25:43] this documentary of Amy Peng so it's out there and it's about an affair that John Lennon had

[00:25:51] with his assistant at the request of Yoko Ono herself so it starts like that so Yoko Ono

[00:25:57] asks Amy to have a relationship with to have an affair with John Lennon because he was

[00:26:04] straining he was not he was unbalanced again and so it starts and the documentary is about

[00:26:11] their side of the story while exposing kind of going back in time and reframing Yoko Ono again as

[00:26:19] a sort of a witchy creature while John Lennon was finally free and finally having fun

[00:26:27] and I against this documentary not against but in confrontation with this or in complement to

[00:26:34] this documentary I would suggest listening to an episode of the great great podcast by Sarah

[00:26:41] Marshall you're wrong about that really focuses on this idea that Yoko Ono broke the Beatles

[00:26:49] but also focuses on John Lennon himself because we are very guilty of treating John Lennon as a

[00:26:55] sort of a baby who was constantly manipulated by Yoko Ono but also perhaps Amy Peng who knows

[00:27:03] you know and he was the man with agency yeah he had a very powerful white man is suddenly given

[00:27:12] no agency and his son no agency subjects to the winds and influence of a couple of women and so

[00:27:20] that's turning it down its head interesting right so that episode is really interesting I think Amy

[00:27:26] Peng's documentary is very interesting as well and there's another documentary which is the

[00:27:34] I think it got the prize here at home as the most boring documentary ever made about the most

[00:27:40] exciting interesting compelling event of the 80s which is the Apple TV documentary about John

[00:27:48] Lennon's assassination I watched the most boring 10 minutes of that I watched and yeah I did more

[00:27:56] and you did good yeah yeah it's a snooze fest it's just how can you turn something so

[00:28:04] you know crucially important have such an important phenomenon into something so boring and also it's

[00:28:12] like I don't know I think that so many people like really care about like there's people who still

[00:28:17] go to the Dakota and go to the Imagine Memorial in Central Park and all of it but since we're

[00:28:24] going we're talking about John Lennon one of the things I think that we that I wanted to highlight is

[00:28:31] that Yokohono was a full blown artist with quite a following when she met him so she was an artist

[00:28:42] in her own right she had a career which is something that people forget a lot about her

[00:28:48] she was invited to do a show in a very important gallery in London and that's how she met him

[00:28:54] a solo show by the way which for a Japanese American artist was quite the achievement

[00:29:01] and also another thing is that when she met John Lennon I think the question to ask

[00:29:10] to her as an artist by that point or from that point onward is also I mean the relationship

[00:29:18] she had with celebrity as a visual artist and I feel that she really believed that she could use

[00:29:25] celebrity to propagate her message and I think she was very naive in her relationship to celebrity

[00:29:35] she seems to have been quite naive about it and not read and fall into the caveats of such

[00:29:42] a relationship you know she felt really ugly she felt bad in the relationship everybody would

[00:29:50] tell her that she wasn't deserving of such a beautiful man which in hindsight kind of think

[00:29:54] beautiful really she's gorgeous yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah well okay

[00:30:01] it maybe it's something of the time you know gorgeous and we don't want to call anyone ugly

[00:30:06] He was also gorgeous for sure, but I mean honestly she was such a powerful woman, charismatic woman.

[00:30:14] So I think there's also that aspect that I would love to, if we have time, sure we will,

[00:30:19] that I'd love to explore with you as well. But anyway, let's go back to the beginnings

[00:30:27] you know, to Yoko Ono as a child. You know, she had a very peculiar upbringing.

[00:30:37] She was born into a family of wealth and privilege who lived in a rarefied atmosphere

[00:30:45] of not only money but also intellectual endeavors. So she her father wanted to be a jazz musician.

[00:30:54] He was all about music and her mother was fascinated by her father because of that.

[00:31:01] Her great-grandfather, a Tsushi-sai-show, was convinced that they had an ancestor

[00:31:08] which was a ninth century founder of a radical Buddhist sect that contributed to overthrow

[00:31:15] the old tradition of feudal military dictatorship or shoguns and restored the role of the emperor.

[00:31:23] And so this ancestor was quite, you know, he was quite engaged in politics but also had a vision

[00:31:32] of how to be a Buddhist, how to be, how to connect faith to power etc. So she was growing up

[00:31:41] in the sort of kind of aspirational setting where it was all about being a virtuoso pianist.

[00:31:50] It was all about knowing poetry, knowing the classics. It was a family that was very oriented

[00:31:59] towards art but they were also very demanding and not very caring as parents. So Yoko Ono

[00:32:08] from a very... She made me think of Nino Simone who wanted to be concert pianists and was always

[00:32:15] told that black woman could never achieve that role. And Yoko Ono wanted to be a concert pianist

[00:32:22] so that's what she wanted to do and her father regularly, as she was growing up,

[00:32:27] was would check on her fingers to see if she had the hands of a pianist and kept telling her

[00:32:34] you're not going to make it, you don't have it. Thank you Father. And Father Dearest.

[00:32:44] And then when she moved on to think, okay if I can't be a pianist maybe I can be a composer,

[00:32:51] he told her women cannot be composers like you can't do it. So on one side she had

[00:32:58] like a very interesting father who was really into music, was into culture but at the same time

[00:33:05] emotionally he was completely disconnected from her and had no... even the remotest idea of supporting

[00:33:13] her as an artist. And then her mum criticized her looks and told her repeatedly that she was very

[00:33:21] lucky to have such a beautiful mum. And would never touch her, like would not hug her, like the same

[00:33:28] Marina Brahmavic scenario where they were very very distant. So she had quite a weird upbringing

[00:33:36] but she also had a Russian aunt, I forget her name, Vervorah something who introduced

[00:33:43] constructivism in Japan. Wow. So you know she had an incredible family to be very honest which is

[00:33:51] also very... which is also a very ambivalent relationship to family isn't it where you have a

[00:33:57] family who kind of feeds you culturally but then emotionally is completely vacant. So that was

[00:34:03] her life and you know her father was very turn towards United States so they went back and forth

[00:34:09] between the States and Japan when the war broke with China in 37, they went back, they were in

[00:34:16] San Francisco, they went back to Tokyo. So there were kind of two in and throwing between the United

[00:34:21] States and Japan until finally the second world war broke in Japan and they were there or they

[00:34:29] went back there and they even though they were wealthy people, they lived a horrible life. They had

[00:34:37] to flee Tokyo, they went into the countryside and this is a crucial moment for the artist Yoko

[00:34:45] Ono because she remembers lying down in some shack looking at the sky and devising menus with her

[00:34:57] brother because they were so hungry they had nothing to eat. They were so hungry that they were just

[00:35:02] dream of menus and she says that was my first art piece, that was the first time where I knew

[00:35:09] that through imagination I could get somewhere and she also realized that no matter what the sky is

[00:35:17] always there for you and it's always producing images for you and it's always imagining too she.

[00:35:23] It's going to stay there, it's all the people eating sushi. So I have a quote from her,

[00:35:36] I realized even then that just through imagining we can be happy so we had our conceptual dinner

[00:35:43] and this is maybe my first piece of art. So I think this encapsulates her personality

[00:35:51] and encapsulates who she is. Yeah, which is art is everything in this situation of hunger

[00:36:00] and we've explored lots of artists who have gone through that including Gihar Hichita's last

[00:36:06] episode. This attitude is a Yoko Ono art will save you, you can't eat but if you imagine art

[00:36:13] you can't, if you imagine a piece of sushi you can be happy. Yeah and what I like about that too

[00:36:20] is like even though she was so you know had this emotional vacuum that she was growing up

[00:36:27] with in her parents, I guess not vacuum. I mean there were a lot of emotions that are just not warm

[00:36:33] caring ones and what a loving thing to do for her little brother you know. I mean she's obviously

[00:36:41] trying to take him to a better place for a really difficult time. That's really you know such an

[00:36:48] act of love that she's doing for brother and if that's where her art came from you know kind of what

[00:36:56] what she's trying to do with other people and strangers and anyone who encounters her art is to

[00:37:02] you know carry them to a better place and I think that's one of the things too that really defines her

[00:37:08] art is that optimism and that turning towards something better and more fruitful for everyone

[00:37:17] not just oneself which is yeah a through-life. That's a really good point you're making actually

[00:37:24] because she was with her brother, she was caring for someone else so she was also taking her brother

[00:37:31] into that journey and she was not alone when she was creating her first piece which of course

[00:37:37] is something that she said afterwards. She realized afterwards and it is true and I think that's

[00:37:43] one of the things we'll be talking about that she's one of the few artists who is not representing

[00:37:49] the world who is not trying to create a relationship with the world as it is she's trying to change

[00:37:58] the world through art and she's very criticized for it she's considered to be a bit polyannish

[00:38:05] you know and I think there's nothing wrong with that and it's actually very much of the time

[00:38:11] conceptual art really wanted to put a dent into the real world. It was not about representing

[00:38:20] it was about presenting possibilities and opening up horizons and for sure she's this episode really

[00:38:28] makes you think of that and also of how independent she was so she was very independent she always had

[00:38:35] even when she was still in Japan she enrolled in the philosophy class course and she had a number

[00:38:45] of love affairs including I think with one or two professors so she was always and I think it's

[00:38:51] also typical of the time when you were a woman who was independent he was trying to achieve something

[00:38:57] in a space where there was male oriented obviously one of the ways to connect to men was through

[00:39:05] love affairs and intimacy which is absolutely understandable she was a woman with desires

[00:39:11] and I love that about her and she's always an apologetic about that totally and not to like psycho

[00:39:16] analyze but it's like if you don't have much intimacy growing up I imagine that's a pretty you

[00:39:22] know that's a good way to get it you know that can feel like a good way to get it

[00:39:28] yeah proactive way of getting what you need and I think she's very good at that

[00:39:33] so her family after this really tough period in Japan went back to New York where she started

[00:39:41] at Sarah Lawrence so it's a private liberal arts college there was quite cutting edge so super

[00:39:48] experimental and it was girls only so she studied English with Catherine Mansel poetry with Alistair

[00:39:56] Reed and she did painting photography cinema performance of video and sometimes even mixing genres

[00:40:04] and when you think about it and when you think about art schools now you kind of think wow

[00:40:09] there was there was something happening there and so bearing mindlessness were still in 1953

[00:40:17] and she creates her first artwork which is called secret peace and so it says decide on one note

[00:40:26] you want to play so still very much connected with music played with the following accompaniment

[00:40:32] the woods from 5 a.m. to 9 a.m. in summer so this was 1953 and what is really interesting and I'm

[00:40:43] always a curator I'm always fascinated by where the visual arts so where artists who produce

[00:40:50] visual artwork come from they don't always go to fine art school and Yoko Ono very much comes

[00:40:58] from the idea of scores and the idea of poetry and especially an overall music that was her thing

[00:41:08] and it's really interesting to see that she goes into instruction art through the idea of the

[00:41:14] school so I was really fascinating another thing that I read was the way she was perceived going

[00:41:22] back to what I was saying regarding her opacity and the fact that she was not a collective person

[00:41:31] she's full of contradictions because she's always concerned with humanity but then she is a very

[00:41:39] solitary person and quite mysterious yeah you can't imagine her sort of joining the sorority

[00:41:44] on campus I mean it's like that would be the entrances of her vibe yeah she has that lonely

[00:41:55] or can yeah independent kind of vibe doesn't she and she's a not a girl school and she had been before

[00:42:03] involved in philosophy so in the pretty much male oriented world so perhaps she wasn't and also

[00:42:11] the education she had had such a privileged education the experience of the war and the nuclear

[00:42:17] bomb when she was 12 I mean all of that will make for someone arriving in New York and having had

[00:42:23] 300 lives compared to all the people who were at school with her so she was described so Maya

[00:42:30] Kupferman says she was particularly adept the best in class she is a high achiever and he recalls

[00:42:39] evidence of a strong intensity she was tightly put together an intent on doing well the other

[00:42:46] students were more relaxed she wasn't relaxed ever at the same time she was a shadow figure on

[00:42:53] campus when you focused on her she was fine but then she sort of disappeared like a phantom

[00:43:00] which is her yeah what a good description and you can see how you know right never met her

[00:43:08] but like that feels exactly right she was described as sweet opaque ghostly ethereal and intelligent

[00:43:17] by her teachers she did another work at the time so this is in the 50s okay so we're still in

[00:43:25] the 50s which was called lighting peace and it's the peace that starts the exhibition I mean there's

[00:43:32] something before as you enter like an on the wall right as you enter that you that you have to walk

[00:43:37] along on the left to go into the first room but the first piece that we see as a video in video

[00:43:45] form is lighting peace where she sat next to a piano and she would light matches and watch them

[00:43:53] burn so that's one of the first pieces as well and it's one that starts the exhibition as well yeah

[00:44:00] and I mean I was just gonna say and I mean that piece in particular it's it's video it's performance

[00:44:06] but it's also instruction it's kind of one of her first instruction pieces maybe I don't know if

[00:44:13] I have that totally right if it's one of her first but I mean it's um one of her early instructions

[00:44:21] at least and the instruction was light a match and watch it till it goes out so it's something

[00:44:27] that she performed in video but then also you know wanted anybody who came along to perform on

[00:44:34] their own wherever and then she performed it loads of times um through her career but it also included

[00:44:43] a concert of an audible sounds and sounds that reach the sky and breaths so she imagined a score again

[00:44:52] kind of linking back to music going through all of this and so she noted in in this this lighting

[00:45:02] I wanted most things to be performed in the dark therefore asking the audience to stretch

[00:45:07] their imaginations so again putting it all back on excuse me you the attendee for participation

[00:45:17] thank you so much for talking about that because that's gonna allow me to make a leap into 1962

[00:45:24] so she eventually married to she each yanagi use a famous composer a japanese composer

[00:45:34] and all the works that she's preparing at Sarah Lawrence including the one you mentioned

[00:45:40] which is made of inaudible sounds because they're either too high too high pitched in some ways

[00:45:48] or impossible to hear in terms of armophology and she performed in a very famous concert place that

[00:45:57] was supposed to be experimental already in 1962 so one of the things that I think is really important

[00:46:03] to say is how incredibly advanced Japan was in terms of experimental art in all areas visual arts

[00:46:11] cinema music every poetry I mean the good time movement was being born that time in another city

[00:46:19] in Japan I mean it was really really intense and therefore this was received not as a sort of

[00:46:27] oddity but you know people were waiting to see what she was going to do and she went so she was

[00:46:34] there after having been in New York with her husband performing that piece and she was with John

[00:46:40] Cage so she came to Japan also to accompany John Cage they were quite close after having had a

[00:46:47] period in New York where she was she started to to know people in the art world including George

[00:46:53] Mousunas who was the person who developed the fluxes movement and so she went to Japan she performed

[00:47:00] that and in the press it was written that her work was derivative that concert you're talking about

[00:47:07] was derivative and was Kajian and Toshi Ichinagi who she was drifting away from you know they were

[00:47:17] drifting away romantically but they were very much close in terms of artistic endeavors and artistic

[00:47:25] sensibility defended her basically what the what the journalist was saying is that she was copying John

[00:47:32] Cage which is really incredible because John Cage had been learning about Buddhism with Professor

[00:47:38] Suzuki in America so if anyone was derivative yeah it was the you know the the American artist who

[00:47:48] were actually learning about Buddhism and incorporating Buddhist you know premises in their work

[00:47:56] but she actually was raised in that well her family was Catholic again like that her family

[00:48:01] was so odd her family was Catholic but she she grew up in the Buddhist country so obviously she

[00:48:06] knew much more about anything and she did incorporate Buddhists thought into her work and so Ichinagi

[00:48:14] defended her and said that this had nothing to do with 433 which was four minutes 33 seconds

[00:48:23] in silence thus validating all the other sounds that you can hear in the concert hall so John Cage's

[00:48:30] piece whereas with her it was all about the sounds that reached the sky and other sounds that

[00:48:37] could not reach your ears so she was producing sound she was not making you listen to the sound

[00:48:42] of the room at all so they missed the point and of course they had to accuse the only woman

[00:48:51] doing something in that concert hall you know or one of the only women as being derivative

[00:48:57] of a Western artist yeah it's likely so and it's I mean you think of like how what a big

[00:49:05] influence John Cage was even on a lot of the artists we've talked about on this podcast in terms

[00:49:11] of yes Philip Gustin I mean even even Dito Morayama I mean but it's like they're I mean none of them

[00:49:21] were like oh you're just ripping off some other guy you know even though they were kind of doing

[00:49:25] things in a different format but yeah I know this I mean of course I mean of course she had to be

[00:49:32] accused yeah it's like even way before John Lennon she was getting in the neck you know this this woman

[00:49:39] for her all the time she was going about it and the photography is actually still going today

[00:49:46] is just a huge monument to her inner strength I mean so many people would have been like you know what

[00:49:53] I don't know maybe it's just not worth it maybe I'll just have a quiet life live it out here in the

[00:49:58] Dakota I'm good you know I mean but yeah it's just continuing and that's yeah that is really

[00:50:06] yeah impressive I mean she started out her life unrecognized and unselibrated by her parents

[00:50:12] by her own family and she went off just doing whatever she wanted to do because when she enrolled

[00:50:17] in philosophy class she was very criticized when she wrote nonfiction they would tell her it was

[00:50:24] too narrative when she wrote fiction they would tell her it was too much out of the bounds of

[00:50:29] what fiction writing was supposed to be I mean she never really felt at home and I think Sarah

[00:50:36] Lawrence was probably the only place where she could really develop her creativity but it was

[00:50:41] the same thing when she was in New York so before going to Japan she started I'm not sure I'm getting

[00:50:47] this one right was it before or after I think was probably after this beginning of the 60s time

[00:50:54] period so she went back to New York and she started welcoming people with her composer husband

[00:51:02] into her into their loft and they would do these performances she would do her paintings you know

[00:51:08] kind of like interactive or yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah

[00:51:16] and then start putting like Japanese characters and ink over it and then lighting it on fire

[00:51:22] and everybody was like oh my god I'm not high you know but this is so the chamber street stuff

[00:51:27] I think this is incredible and I think I think this just again goes to the heart of what she is and

[00:51:34] when when we came to the chamber street stuff in the exhibition because I had no idea that she was

[00:51:40] just like throwing up in the doors to these avant-garde artists in New York at that time and maybe

[00:51:47] this was pre-factory could this have been pre-factory I mean it was really sure maybe the same time yeah

[00:51:54] it was yeah but I mean factory was 1963 right so it was kind of developing at the same time

[00:52:03] yeah yeah but even still as you say for a woman to kind of be at the forefront of doing that

[00:52:11] is is is incredible this is where I started to think of her differently because to be honest

[00:52:17] it's like her work has never it's had I've had a hard time relating to her work

[00:52:24] but when because very cerebral and what does it want me to do and this doesn't feel like

[00:52:30] you're trying that hard what are you producing here Yoko Ono you're producing an instruction

[00:52:35] for me to do something is this art you know and I mean I've had all of this kind of

[00:52:40] all you making what are you making exactly what are you performing perform for me come on

[00:52:47] and I mean you know so it's like I went to this this exhibition in Minneapolis years and years ago

[00:52:55] and I remember there was a room and it had some kind of like tuning fork in it and it was like

[00:53:06] you know you just need to hit the tuning fork and I just want to be like I'm gonna feel that

[00:53:11] like what what is this supposed to be so anyway so lots of cerebral kind of like overload which

[00:53:18] I frankly get in a lot of exhibitions you know especially with contemporary art you know my brain

[00:53:25] goes into overdrive it's like what is this you know I don't get it you know in my the questions

[00:53:31] roll in and I just have to let that sort of intellectual vomit just pass you know I just need to

[00:53:40] let it out let it go and then I just need to and then I can kind of sit with whatever it is the

[00:53:48] artist wants me to sit with and then maybe I can feel something I would call I would call that

[00:53:54] an intellectual panic I think conceptual arts really sets up the audience to first of all

[00:54:05] be very very discombobulated and then go into a slight panic of what the hell is this yeah you

[00:54:13] know what is this what are you doing what why do you want me to do something what are you doing

[00:54:18] what's so great about this you know I made it so it's like but when when I when I read about the

[00:54:26] Chamber of Street stuff I started to Chamber Street just to just to explain for our listeners is

[00:54:34] the loft that she shared with her composer husband and where she started welcoming lots of people from

[00:54:42] John Cage, Philip Glass, Jasper Johns, Robert Roush and Berg, David Tudor, Terry Ryler and very

[00:54:51] importantly Le Monter Young because they became quite close afterwards yeah and so loads of avant-garde

[00:54:58] artists at the time to this loft to just explore art and performances to just explore art together can

[00:55:04] you imagine doing that nowadays people will be like what are we what are you doing can we have a

[00:55:10] dinner you know more than I can you're doing the roasts yeah well yeah so this apparently doesn't

[00:55:16] happen anymore then I mean it was happening at school or something right I mean I think that

[00:55:22] we've come to a place in the art world that is very conservative and it's getting harder and harder

[00:55:28] to convey conceptual practices and to get together around art and that's how not to plug it you know

[00:55:39] I didn't create drawing now outfit it wasn't my invention just work for them and I really love

[00:55:44] drawing now because of that because you end up talking about drawing and you seem very passionate

[00:55:49] people really wanting to talk about the art what they've seen in the gallery boots the talks we do

[00:55:56] the round tables always end up with people meeting each other going after for coffees to talk about

[00:56:01] what they're doing and it's becoming more and more rare to have that kind of event and shout out to

[00:56:08] a very good friend who haven't seen in a long long time called Pierre Luguyon he's an amazing artist

[00:56:14] and he did this thing called la promesse de l'écran the promise of the screen and he would set up

[00:56:25] a screen so there would be a screen where he would project he would invite artists to

[00:56:30] propose videos that's where Diogo did his first performance so the screen for Diogo was the sheet

[00:56:38] of paper that he folded turned into a cube and made his first cube performance which you can see

[00:56:43] and then do check it out Diogo Pimentao plugging in my husband's work I'm wearing a bit like

[00:56:50] Yoko Onan John Lennon basically totally and and so in the middle of the so you'd have the screening

[00:56:58] or the performance or whatever and then the screen would lift up and there was a bar behind it

[00:57:04] and so people would drink but because they had just experienced something together it was one of the

[00:57:09] first arts experiences I had where people were really talking about the work and there was such a

[00:57:17] bit I'm not a very big small talker so for me was like one of the happiest places you know

[00:57:24] I experienced when I lived in Paris this was around 2006 2007 and was so so pleasant but it's

[00:57:31] very rare actually because in the art world everyone's anxious they want to prove that they're doing

[00:57:36] something that they're you know that they're progressing in the right direction or they want

[00:57:42] you to go and see their exhibition and this you know so it's all about plugging stuff and not really

[00:57:47] talking about the art and so in this time I mean of course this was a phenomenon of the time as well

[00:57:56] there were no there was no social media TV was crap people would get together people

[00:58:00] were out in the streets demonstrating they were out in the streets fighting for civil rights you know

[00:58:06] it was the time when people really got together and collectivity was a thing where you were building

[00:58:13] some a better future in some way so of course like Marina Abramovich she was all her time for sure

[00:58:20] but she started really early on and she did start at the loft culture which became so much of a thing

[00:58:27] for people like Laurie Anderson, Lou Reed even the factory I mean all of those even the cliche

[00:58:36] that you now see in films of the 80s where you know you had an artist loft with neon sculptures

[00:58:41] all the time yeah that came from there she was the first one to do that you know yeah

[00:58:47] and that's quite I mean just to link back to a point I started to make about five minutes ago I feel like

[00:58:54] she's so sorry no no no we wondered that's what it's all about we wondered yes we did

[00:59:01] I'm just mentioning and it was actually remembered to link back to it so proud of you basically wow

[00:59:09] I'm impressed yeah thank you but the but it was through the chambers through the loft stuff that

[00:59:17] made me see her as an event organizer so it's like in a way you know and it's like so it's about

[00:59:24] a welcoming people into a space and and us holding it really lightly just to see what happens

[00:59:31] to see what unfolds and I mean just to kind of you know give up give a framing but give up control

[00:59:40] you know and and and that's when I thought basically that's what I do in my job

[00:59:46] I'm an event organizer so basically and I have a husband that plays guitar same same we are the same

[00:59:55] listen it's us we are reverberate we're pursuing the tradition exactly our influence of the

[01:00:02] powerful yeah Yoko Ono has influenced us beyond our even consciousness until just now which is amazing

[01:00:11] until just now but I have to say it's like so the exhibition just to jump to the exhibition for

[01:00:16] a second I was gonna say isn't that what the exhibition is yeah but make your point so the exhibition

[01:00:24] as you mentioned before you actually get in there there's the wish trees which is something she's

[01:00:30] been doing for years and it's trees that are indoors and you can write a wish and hang in on the

[01:00:36] tree or outdoors yeah yeah and and it comes from a Buddhist tradition guys she really incorporates

[01:00:45] Buddhism into the works she did like yeah and and and first hand not through Professor Suzuki who

[01:00:53] was teaching everyone in back in the States but like through her own culture sorry yeah and

[01:00:58] the fact no for sure because that comes up again and cut piece which we'll talk about later on but

[01:01:05] but so but what I liked about that was you know having your first experience of the exhibition

[01:01:14] be something so personal and collective it puts yourself in a it like taps into your higher

[01:01:22] mind you know it's like oh what is my wish what's my great wish right now and you know looking at the

[01:01:30] wishes I mean it was wonderful I mean they were just like written in all sorts of languages and

[01:01:35] you know the the ones that I could read in English I mean were high wishes wishes for peace wishes

[01:01:42] for freedom wishes for dignity and you know freedom for Palestine and peace and you create and all

[01:01:50] you know kind of they weren't like I want to win a lottery you know I want to do a car you know it

[01:01:56] wasn't you know wishes for trivial kind of earthly things it really you know it it helps people

[01:02:04] before they even go into the exhibition to be in a frame of mind that is much different than they

[01:02:10] would be if they just plunged into lighting piece initially like that is um it's like a filter it's

[01:02:20] like she's sifting out your you know kind of you know normal everyday thoughts and she's putting

[01:02:29] everybody into a place and I think about that you know I mean on a much much lower level Joanna

[01:02:38] um I mean well Jack White's again no no we could yeah no but on a much lower level it's like I've

[01:02:45] thought about that with events that I've put together it's like you know posing oh that's not

[01:02:51] a lower level but I mean it's not an exhibition at the tape but um but like you know opening

[01:02:58] with a question to get people into a frame of mind to prime the mind for the conversation that is

[01:03:05] to come so that they might be a little bit more open or might be a little bit more expansive than

[01:03:11] they would be if they hadn't had that initial question but yeah I mean I think so you think her

[01:03:18] work is about you think her work is about togetherness yeah definitely I mean she you know she

[01:03:25] definitely has the collective and she definitely has you know her her her her respect and belief in

[01:03:33] imagination is profound and you get that the moment you know that's the first thing you get in

[01:03:41] the exhibition is what's your wish you know what like imagine you know and that yeah I mean and

[01:03:47] that's certainly something that flows through with uh with a lot of the places but it's I just think

[01:03:54] you know artist and art comes with a lot of baggage and in my mind there is that baggage like

[01:04:01] what are you creating what are you performing otherwise you know what to skill which you scale

[01:04:06] what to skill it's a lot about skill and we interpret skill I wrote a text a few years back about

[01:04:13] the idea of skill in drawing and I shifted the the attention from the skill of the line

[01:04:22] to the skill of framing whatever line you're doing or someone else would be doing like in

[01:04:29] solo wit for example where people would make his drawings not not him and the idea of skill here

[01:04:36] is very interesting because the skill is not enough sort of a technical talent that you correlate

[01:04:45] with traditional technologies of art it's somewhere else and she really is um I agree with you she

[01:04:55] I mean she says so herself it's all about letting go and she is bored with the art world she's not

[01:05:00] interested in the art world she is interested in giving the power for everyone to be an artist

[01:05:08] through the power of imagination that's what she wants to do she finds it extremely boring

[01:05:14] to um deal with the egos of artists and that's another uh Japanese thing that she's bringing in which

[01:05:22] is a very different idea of the ego and when you think about artists immediately the ego of

[01:05:30] authorship is there and she doesn't have that and to your point the lighting piece so the first one

[01:05:37] that really kind of I think in some ways after the wish tree and after the sentence that she wrote

[01:05:46] in the beginning and when you get into the room and you see lighting piece it suddenly becomes

[01:05:53] uber conceptual suddenly you think oh where is this about hmm this is something else it's not

[01:05:59] something I can participate in so there's a lot of text and you read the text and you understand

[01:06:05] where she performed it first when she thought of it uh what this video is from who felt who made

[01:06:11] the video because it's all about togetherness for her and also the repetition of certain gestures

[01:06:16] because the wish trees are very known you know yeah I've experienced them before I'm sure you have

[01:06:21] as well and so when you get there I immediately thought of um the scene the very famous scene

[01:06:31] of Tarkovsky's film nostalgia where a character has to cross a cold pool of water holding a candle

[01:06:45] and not letting the flame go off the flame of the candle and so it's a very potent scene that is a

[01:06:54] lot about faith and I don't relate to Tarkovsky very much because it's very

[01:06:59] faith-driven and religion-driven and that scene has always annoying me and yoga loves it

[01:07:06] and I find it incredibly annoying I find it excruciatingly I don't want to say corny

[01:07:12] because it's a terrible word but have a hard time with it because it's all about you sweating

[01:07:19] making an effort it's so effort-driven it's so it's not about face to me it's about you know

[01:07:27] realizing where the draft is coming from where you know kind of protecting the candle holding

[01:07:34] your body in cold water it's it's a very male-performative kind of thing whereas with her what is so

[01:07:41] beautiful it's just holding a match um watching it burn it takes time and that's the time you're

[01:07:49] going to take to see that energy live its life start really powerful then gaining momentum

[01:07:57] and then slowly fading away and dying out and that's it and she's by a piano so obviously the

[01:08:03] exhibition is called music of the mind there's this idea of the score as well music takes time

[01:08:10] it takes place in time it's an action and you feel an energy in it and that's something that is

[01:08:17] irreducible but also in some ways very personal but at the same time collective so she's

[01:08:23] saying a lot of things were that piece that I think probably was a bit discombobulating for those

[01:08:28] who arrived from the very immediate like I'm gonna make a wish and this is all about imagination

[01:08:34] and suddenly she has quite a few conceptual pieces that are not so accessible like you were saying

[01:08:41] in the exhibition we will continue in the next episode to talk about yoga owners incredible

[01:08:49] journey we're still in the beginning of the 60s so that's crazy and we haven't even talked about

[01:08:54] the paintings yet we're still in 1962 and that's why we decided to turn this into two part

[01:09:01] episode for the first time because we really thought that this was an artist who deserves attention

[01:09:09] and not to be defined by one of the husbands she had in her life so thank you so much for

[01:09:16] following on this exploration of the work of Yoko Ono part one we hope you enjoyed listening as

[01:09:24] we enjoyed recording this conversation don't forget to follow us on instagram at exhibitionist's

[01:09:30] podcast and leave us a review we'd love to hear from you follow the podcast it means a lot and

[01:09:36] it does make a huge difference as everyone knows tell your friends leave us comments and suggestions

[01:09:42] and don't forget we visit exhibition so that you have to go out there give your local gallery a

[01:09:49] visit why not stroll on in it's not as scary as you might think it is I have found that to be true

[01:09:57] so it's always worth it even if you don't like it read a bit about the artist and let us know what

[01:10:04] you are seeing and hearing out there and what it's meaning to you that would be fantastic so until then

[01:10:12] take care all right take care thank you for doing this with us see you Emily always so nice to chat

[01:10:20] with you and take care and get well soon and you take care bye bye we'll do

[01:10:50] you

[01:11:20] you

[01:11:50] you

[01:12:20] you

[01:12:50] you

[01:13:20] you