On Kawara: Life As Art, Painting Time
ExhibitionistasFebruary 07, 2025x
11
01:02:3057.22 MB

On Kawara: Life As Art, Painting Time

In this episode, Joana P. R. Neves and co-host Liberté Nuti look back on On Kawara's exhibition at David Zwirner Gallery London, Date Paintings (21 November 2024 to 25 January 2025 ).

To know more about Liberté Nuti:https://www.haerbnuti.com/

Follow her on Instagram: @libertenuti

For more information on the show:https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2024/on-kawara-london

For more information on On Kawara and One Million Years Foundation:https://www.onemillionyearsfoundation.org/

They explore the life and work of On Kawara, a significant figure in contemporary art known for his repetitive and conceptual Date Paintings (1966 - 2012).

How do you deal with an artist who did everything he could to reduce life to art, and thus preserve life's unique intangibility? How do you experience a series of works dedicated to the obsessive recording of time through craft?

"It was quite the experience"

"On Kawara is a concept, in himself"

"What else do you want?"

Music by Sarturn.

Support us on:https://exhibitionistaspodcast.com/ and go to the DONATE page.




00:00:13
As you know, Exhibition Nesters is 1 year old.

00:00:17
We're very excited with this second year and we're also

00:00:20
excited to welcome new Co hosts that will always bring a

00:00:25
contrasting position to mine, whether it's because like Emily,

00:00:30
they do not work in the contemporary art field or maybe

00:00:34
they have different roles within it, which will be the case for

00:00:37
my hosts. Today.

00:00:39
We have an amazing episode. We were very inspired by the

00:00:44
absolutely incredible opportunity to see On Kawara's

00:00:49
date paintings in a very encompassing exhibition at

00:00:53
David's Verna Gallery in London. We do mention the foundation

00:00:59
that On Kawara founded during his lifetime, the 1

00:01:05
Years Foundation, and we will have the links if you want to

00:01:11
check it out. I also make a little mistake.

00:01:15
I mix the names of two very, very prominent American artists,

00:01:21
Robert Smithson and Robert Morris.

00:01:24
It was Robert Morris indeed, who created the artwork box with the

00:01:30
sound of its own making in 1961. So apologies for that.

00:01:38
And I think that's about it. Yes, we have a video version

00:01:44
now. So if you're more of a visual

00:01:45
person, the videos do have images.

00:01:48
But if you're an audio person, if you like the experience of

00:01:52
closing your eyes and imagining yourself at David's Vernas

00:01:56
gallery, do it. Audio is amazing.

00:02:00
So let's do this. Let's start this incredible

00:02:05
episode with my amazing cohost, Liberty Nuti.

00:02:20
Welcome to Exhibitionistas, the podcast where we visit

00:02:24
exhibitions so that you have to all so that you can experience

00:02:27
them vicariously through us. So today we have a very special

00:02:32
one. We are talking about the

00:02:35
exhibition at David's Werner Gallery in London of the date

00:02:40
paintings by On Kawara. It was quite the experience.

00:02:45
So the rule is very simple. My Co host and I visit the

00:02:49
exhibition separately and compare notes during the

00:02:54
recording. And today my Co host is none

00:02:58
other than Libertinuti, who you know from a previous episode

00:03:02
where she was our guest talking about art advisory.

00:03:07
She is indeed an art advisor specialized in modern art and a

00:03:12
tiny bit of contemporary art. But she has such an acute and

00:03:15
keen eye that it's going to be a pleasure to talk about the

00:03:20
exhibition with her. Today I am Joanna PR Nevis,

00:03:25
contemporary art writer and curator and artistic director of

00:03:29
Drawing Now Paris So Liberty, thank you so much for being

00:03:34
here, for counterbalancing my more research focused experience

00:03:40
of contemporary art and bringing maybe the experience and the

00:03:46
points of view of a more market driven job and experience in the

00:03:51
art world. But most of all, thank you so

00:03:53
much for being here and for being my Co host today.

00:03:56
So nice to be back, Joanna. We must confess to your audience

00:04:00
that we've made an exception to your podcast.

00:04:02
Oops. You are revealing the insides

00:04:09
and the backstage of the episodes you naughty Co host.

00:04:13
OK, go ahead and say it. We went together.

00:04:18
I didn't really understand the rule at the time that we went

00:04:20
back together and yet we look at it separately.

00:04:24
And when we went, I promised you I shall not share my views

00:04:28
during our exhibition and I said no matter what.

00:04:33
And I think we did. We did.

00:04:35
We were very wise and very contained.

00:04:39
I'm I'm very proud of us, honestly.

00:04:42
But Liberty, how was your weekend culture?

00:04:45
I thought it was a really intense week.

00:04:48
First was the commemoration of the 80 years of the liberation

00:04:54
of the Auschwitz camp and which I watch on TV.

00:04:58
And I thought it was so emotional to hear the last

00:05:01
survivors who are now now in their 90s, so much hardship and

00:05:07
forgiveness at the same time. And really the message was from

00:05:11
all of them in the different ways was they want us to

00:05:16
remember. I watched the rise of the Nazi,

00:05:21
which is a three-part BBC documentaries and it really

00:05:25
shows how Germany went from a a democracy, the Vaima Republic to

00:05:33
a total terrorism system. And this is so interesting to

00:05:38
watch 100 years after it goes so quickly and it's just little

00:05:45
things which kind of brings that type of of of regime and it

00:05:49
shows the. I wonder why you're speaking

00:05:52
about that. At this moment, nothing in the

00:05:55
world makes us think of the potentiality of a new form of

00:05:59
fascism, right? And populism, that's really and.

00:06:02
Populism. But what's interesting coming to

00:06:05
our subject is he also made me think of on Kahawa, who is a

00:06:11
child of the Second World War, is a Japanese person who

00:06:16
witnessed Hiroshima when he was an adolescent.

00:06:20
Yeah, it has a huge impact on him and it's specifically

00:06:24
moulded his choices as an artist.

00:06:27
Yeah. So As for myself, I've been

00:06:29
trying to read Liberty and it's, it's been really, really

00:06:32
difficult. I've been trying to reread

00:06:36
actually, which is something that I'm really enjoying doing

00:06:38
at the moment. I picked up a book I had read a

00:06:43
few months ago called Parade by Rachel Cusk, and I was really

00:06:48
interested in that book because all the characters, all the

00:06:52
central characters, I would say I are called G.

00:06:55
They're just a letter. She's very keen on modernist

00:07:00
takes on literature and nouveau homo.

00:07:03
And so she kind of produces these frameworks whereby she

00:07:06
develops the narrative and the what really made me pick up the

00:07:10
book was the fact that there's a character there, G maybe short

00:07:15
for genius, which is something that she obviously deconstructs,

00:07:18
and G is a painter who makes paintings upside down.

00:07:23
Oh, reminds me of someone. Who could that be?

00:07:26
And who has a very strange position about women?

00:07:29
As someone else that came to your mind, specifically

00:07:34
Basilitz, who said that women couldn't be painters.

00:07:37
So of course, critics spotted that, and that book had a sort

00:07:42
of echo in the contemporary art field.

00:07:46
Going back to On Koara Liberty, we kind of touched upon this a

00:07:50
little bit when you suggested doing an episode on him.

00:07:53
But don't you find that he's kind of a monolith?

00:07:56
And he's one of those few artists that I would never have

00:08:00
thought of investigating because it's just taken, I think, by us

00:08:05
spectators and even our professionals as an entity that

00:08:10
is completely merged with the work.

00:08:13
Don't you agree? Totally, I had the same feeling

00:08:18
actually. On Kawara is a concept is

00:08:22
himself. Even his name was a mystery when

00:08:25
we when I think about it. Was it his real name?

00:08:30
What is his first name on? And at the same time, I thought

00:08:35
I knew a lot about him because his work revolves around his

00:08:40
daily life and activities and you have a feeling of who he is.

00:08:43
Even if he's extremely elusive. At the end of of the day, you

00:08:48
can show us what you've discovered about him.

00:08:53
Artist. As I started reading, I realised

00:08:57
that he really was not keen on having his biography out there.

00:09:02
And he established the foundation during his lifetime

00:09:07
and the foundation has a website, it's called 1

00:09:11
Years Foundation. And when you click on his name

00:09:14
expecting to find the whole biography, you just have written

00:09:19
on the screen, a sort of very minimal and empty screen

00:09:23
biography of on Kowara 29 days.

00:09:30
And then there is a photo of his studio in black and white, which

00:09:35
is kind of midway between bureaucratic setting and an

00:09:41
artist studio with cupboards in the back with very high and thin

00:09:47
doors. That suggests an incredible

00:09:52
number of archives being kept behind them.

00:09:58
So someone who was very reluctant in being presented as

00:10:04
a life and much more keen to turn their life into art or art

00:10:11
into life, what would I do? Do I talk about his biography?

00:10:17
Do I talk about the work? So what I decided to do is

00:10:21
perhaps to start with one of his last works and to honour this

00:10:27
ethos, let's say, of the artist and describe the work that he

00:10:32
started in 1993 called 1 Years Past and Future.

00:10:38
What do you think, Libert? Did you think that's a good

00:10:40
idea? Yes, and I think you would have

00:10:43
liked. That on car, if you're

00:10:44
listening, this is for you. So in 197071 he started a folder

00:10:52
listing a million years from 1960 down.

00:10:58
Then in 1980 in another folder he listed a million years into

00:11:04
the future. So there's a gap between 71 and

00:11:07
1980, and in 1993 he joined those two works in the form of

00:11:14
readings. So two people read, 1 reads the

00:11:17
odd numbers, the other one reads the other numbers.

00:11:20
The odd numbers are read by a male identifying person and the

00:11:25
other numbers are read by a female identifying person.

00:11:29
A non binary person can choose one of the two and these are

00:11:33
performative work so they read in front of an audience.

00:11:38
They take a lot of time obviously and they have been

00:11:42
performed all over the world. So this is just to give you an

00:11:47
idea of the type of materials that On Kawara was working with.

00:11:53
So notions as vast as time and space in some ways, and the

00:11:58
conventionalities that come attached to those two concepts.

00:12:03
So dates, counting lists, binders and paintings, because

00:12:10
obviously we're talking about an exhibition that is Paintings on

00:12:13
the Wall. So basically this is what we're

00:12:17
talking about when we're talking about the work of On Kowara.

00:12:22
With this project that you just described is ongoing, it's still

00:12:27
alive, it's not there but and it's it's going to carry on for

00:12:32
many years because that 1 year reading backwards

00:12:35
and forwards will take a long time to put together.

00:12:40
So on Kawara biography, he was born in 1932 in Karia, in a

00:12:47
small town in Japan, and he died in New York in 2014.

00:12:53
The major episode of his life was obviously the Nagasaki and

00:12:59
Hiroshima bombings when he was 12 years old.

00:13:02
And it kind of marked a rupture in his personality.

00:13:07
He had been, up until then, a studious young little boy.

00:13:12
And from then onward, when he was in class and a teacher would

00:13:16
ask him something, he would say, I don't understand.

00:13:20
He was unyielding. And from that point onward, he

00:13:24
felt like he didn't believe anything.

00:13:26
So the system of belief cracked within himself.

00:13:31
If you compare to Yoko Ono, it's a completely different way of

00:13:35
relating to the same horrendous episodes of Yoko Ono would

00:13:40
devise menus with her brother lying on the ground in the

00:13:43
countryside looking at the clouds and discovered the

00:13:46
empowering force of imagination. So very different relationships

00:13:52
with an event that you that would anyway have moulded your

00:13:56
personality and the way it did tells a lot about the

00:14:02
disposition of of the artist in question.

00:14:05
Then from what we understand, it really closed down.

00:14:08
It kind of shut down. We I do not understand and not

00:14:13
wanted to move or engage in any ways.

00:14:17
So that kind of places him outside of the realm of the

00:14:20
disgust things because he don't doesn't understand them.

00:14:23
So he embraced a sort of nihilistic perspective on life.

00:14:29
In 1951, he moved to Tokyo. He met a number of artists in a

00:14:35
bookshop where, for someone who didn't understand, he read quite

00:14:40
voraciously. So he devoured Freud's writings,

00:14:44
Marx's writings, the existentialists, Sartre and

00:14:48
Camus in particular. So he was very well read.

00:14:51
And because he stayed in the bookshop reading, he met a

00:14:54
number of artists and became or started a practice as an artist.

00:14:58
He started painting in 1958. He moves to Mexico where he

00:15:04
spends three years. There his father was the

00:15:07
director of an engineering company, and so he was very

00:15:10
comfortably living there, going to art school, meeting all the

00:15:15
intelligentsia, and he also started exploring Mexico.

00:15:19
So I think that also was also the beginning of one of the

00:15:23
aspects of On Koara's biography, which is that he was a very keen

00:15:27
traveler. And I think he said to Casper

00:15:30
Kearney, if I'm not mistaken, that if he hadn't been an

00:15:34
artist, he would have been the travel agent.

00:15:38
There you go. Yeah.

00:15:41
Anyway, he then went to to Europe.

00:15:46
He lived between New York and Paris at a certain point.

00:15:50
A very important time before he settled in 1965 in New York, was

00:15:55
when he went to Spain, to Altamira, and he visited the

00:15:58
caves. And so that specific experience

00:16:02
was incredibly powerful because that experience of art that

00:16:07
remained in time. So that form of presence of arts

00:16:12
and of drawings and paintings and the absence of the rituals

00:16:16
around The Cave kind of also had an impact on the way he would

00:16:21
devise his works. And so in 1965, when he finally

00:16:27
settles in New York, he meets all the Conceptualists,

00:16:32
obviously he meets the Minimalists.

00:16:34
So he comes into contact with an incredibly creative, forceful

00:16:42
group of people who rejected a number of things, placing the

00:16:48
ego or the subject or the the the personal experience at the

00:16:52
centre of the creative act. Symbolisms.

00:16:58
Rejecting metaphor, being literal, rejecting painting in a

00:17:04
lot of ways and embracing graphic expression, embracing

00:17:10
language, embracing even bureaucratic practices in some

00:17:15
ways, and also rejecting the Yeah.

00:17:20
Systematic and the series. The embracing the systematic,

00:17:24
the system and the series absolutely.

00:17:27
So on. Kowara found a like minded group

00:17:33
of people and in 1966 he starts the works that we saw in the

00:17:41
exhibition at David's Verner in London called The Date.

00:17:45
Paintings that went on he went on to make until 2012, so until

00:17:51
two years before his passing. So, Liberty, you are going to

00:17:56
talk about the Dave paintings in the second part?

00:17:59
So we'll, we'll, we'll visit the exhibition together when he goes

00:18:04
to New York and really get into that group.

00:18:07
He's not, he's 33 years old and he's not a baby anymore.

00:18:11
He's, he's already done quite a lot and that's really when he's

00:18:15
blossoming. And I thought the age is quite

00:18:17
important there too. But he has a long way to go.

00:18:21
And also it's, it's, it's important to say that he did

00:18:24
paint even when he was in Japan, he had these paintings that were

00:18:28
very graphic, almost comics inspired about dire situations,

00:18:35
lots of bodies in, in, in difficult and painful situations

00:18:39
or isolated after the date paintings which bear the dates

00:18:44
of the day when he makes them. So he has 24 hours to produce a

00:18:50
painting that states the date when it was made.

00:18:55
So of course this resonates a lot with works at the time.

00:19:00
Robert Smithson's box with the sound of its own making comes to

00:19:05
mind, obviously, and so many other works which are self

00:19:09
referential. But there's an existentialist

00:19:13
take to Ankawara, because this is also a performative act.

00:19:18
He has to make the painting on that day.

00:19:21
Obviously, this is a very rigid structure, so there aren't

00:19:25
paintings for each day. If you're wondering, dear

00:19:27
listener, there's a huge gaps. But apparently he was able in

00:19:31
the 70s to go three months, three whole months with making a

00:19:36
painting each day. So there are several dimensions

00:19:40
for these paintings, several letterings, several fonts and

00:19:44
colours. But Liberty, you will explain

00:19:47
all of this in the second part of the episode and after the

00:19:51
break. He decides to do a painting a

00:19:53
day, but it is not. Some days he doesn't do one

00:20:00
because he can't. Some days they are destroyed

00:20:03
because it's he's not quick enough.

00:20:06
Then he takes. Some breaks, there is some

00:20:09
intermittence. It's continuity, but

00:20:11
intermittence, again, you have always this double force in in

00:20:19
the work of Onkarawa. And some days he even does 2A

00:20:22
day. The same dates he repeats the

00:20:26
same date. Yeah.

00:20:29
Really. I didn't know that.

00:20:31
You will remember when we go to the exhibition together.

00:20:35
I can't wait. So let's just go over the series

00:20:39
of works he made. So on Kawara was paradoxically a

00:20:44
very prolific artist, but had just a a small number of series

00:20:49
of works and a lot of them were based on postcards.

00:20:52
So he started in 1968, two years after he started the date

00:20:57
paintings. The series I got up.

00:21:01
So this series of works states simply the sentence I got up and

00:21:08
the time when he got up, so the hour and the minutes.

00:21:12
He started this series in Mexico knowing that Kaspar Kony, his

00:21:17
friend, loves to receive postcards, and so he sent 2

00:21:23
postcards a day for 12 years. And so again, still no

00:21:29
handwriting, only stamps. And The funny thing about this

00:21:33
series is that Kasper Koenig says in an interview that this

00:21:38
series stopped an anecdotally, because he he was carrying, I

00:21:44
think in Finland, the briefcase where he kept his stamps for the

00:21:48
series. And the briefcase was stolen.

00:21:51
And so that's why. And that's how.

00:21:54
The must have a boots count. The most absorbed those cars and

00:22:00
that's how the series stopped. So it's very interesting because

00:22:04
there's a, so there's a postcard, there's also an image

00:22:06
in the back. And in some ways the highly

00:22:09
personal meets the blandest and most reduced form of expression

00:22:14
of time and place. Because of course there's

00:22:16
images, but those images are for tourists.

00:22:19
So they are the most neutral, the most conventional images you

00:22:23
can have of a landscape or of a place.

00:22:26
So this series is also a bit trickier than the date

00:22:29
paintings, but because it is more personal, you can track on

00:22:33
Koara's habits. And it's interesting that it's

00:22:36
choose the medium of postcard because today who buys a

00:22:42
postcard and who sends a postcard?

00:22:44
It's it's, we still do it, but it's a little bit of the time.

00:22:49
And Speaking of that, we even find telegrams in his work as

00:22:53
well. The time.

00:22:55
Because the I'm still alive series started with three

00:22:59
telegrams sent in 1969. So I'm still alive is the same

00:23:05
idea. Then the I got up postcards so

00:23:08
he would send postcards saying I'm still alive and so he sent 3

00:23:13
telegrams, telegrams saying I am not going to commit suicide,

00:23:19
don't worry. So that was the first one.

00:23:22
The second one it is. I am not going to commit suicide

00:23:27
worry. OK.

00:23:32
And the third one is I am going to sleep.

00:23:35
Forget it. The third one kind of is the

00:23:38
hinge upon which he then finds the final form of this series,

00:23:45
which is saying I'm still alive. The same thing with the day

00:23:47
paintings. It destroyed most of them, but

00:23:50
they were saying something. Something.

00:23:54
The word something. Something just one word and

00:23:58
looking like the date painting monochrome background.

00:24:02
Not many are left because they destroy most of them I think.

00:24:07
So there's this basis of a form of dread, a form of existential

00:24:14
dread that very quickly is overturned by the bureaucratic

00:24:19
keeping of time and a a sort of sense of humor as well.

00:24:24
So the I'm still alive I find absolutely hilarious because as

00:24:28
soon. Receives it to postcard.

00:24:31
Can you imagine? You'd be like, great.

00:24:34
But is he? I think that's the question you

00:24:36
ask yourself, because then you think of the possibility of the

00:24:40
opposite being also true after the postcard was made, no?

00:24:46
Doesn't your mind go there? Yeah, absolutely.

00:24:49
And it's it's very positive because I'm not going to commit

00:24:52
suicide. It's a very passive aggressive

00:24:54
either way phrase as I'm still alive is taking life with a

00:25:00
positive twist. And in a way there is a lot of

00:25:05
humour because what do you reply to that?

00:25:07
And it reassures you, even though you don't know if the

00:25:12
person is still alive when you receive it a week after.

00:25:15
I have a funny story about this series which is about a couple

00:25:21
of collectors. So they started by collecting

00:25:24
expressionistic German expressionist painting and then

00:25:29
slowly they turned towards conceptual art, minimalist art,

00:25:32
process art. And they loved on Koara and they

00:25:37
had one of the date paintings in their living room and their

00:25:41
friends mocked them endlessly because of their collection and

00:25:44
couldn't understand why on earth they would collect postcards

00:25:49
based work, data based work. They they couldn't get it and

00:25:55
until one day they they were in a horrendous train accident.

00:26:03
And so the wife got away OK ish. But the husband was between life

00:26:10
and death for a while. And they're the funny and the

00:26:14
interesting story within this story is that the wife was

00:26:20
talking with one of their friends.

00:26:22
He was calling to ask about the husband and and when they were

00:26:28
chatting on the phone, the person said, you know what I was

00:26:34
thinking of the date paintings that you have in your living

00:26:36
room and that artist that you told me about.

00:26:39
And I never understood why you liked that work.

00:26:43
And now that we are in the situation of thinking of losing

00:26:47
the both of you, I finally understand the meaning.

00:26:51
Of the news of of Ankara, why is very anchored in in the to, you

00:26:58
know, day-to-day quite mundane a postcard from this and there

00:27:03
just putting the date. It's quite funny.

00:27:05
But at the end of the day, what else?

00:27:08
I am still alive. This is the most important

00:27:11
thing. That's why we want to know about

00:27:12
our children, our loved 1. You are still alive.

00:27:15
We're OK. And that's a genius of Onkarawa.

00:27:20
And I think he got to the same conclusion at the end of the 60s

00:27:24
because that's the moment where he stopped talking about his art

00:27:28
and stopped agreeing to talk about his art most of the time.

00:27:33
And when he was questioned by a journalist, a student and art

00:27:38
critic about his work, he would send one of those postcards as a

00:27:42
response. Really.

00:27:44
Yes. I'm going to have to do that

00:27:47
too. So he started in 68 as well,

00:27:53
another series called I Went. So this is based on maps.

00:27:57
So he photocopied maps to the size of an A4 sheet of paper

00:28:02
that he that then kept in a binder.

00:28:04
And he just basically took a red felt pen and he traced the

00:28:10
journey that he did by walking or any other form of

00:28:14
transportation in that specific place.

00:28:17
So always this relationship between time and place rather

00:28:23
than time and space. As I said before, probably

00:28:26
there's finally the other series I met from 1968 to 1979 where he

00:28:33
made. So he indexed to a day, a sheet

00:28:37
of paper to a day. And on that sheet of paper, he

00:28:40
would write the names of the people that he met on that day.

00:28:44
And the the genesis of this work is really funny because as a

00:28:48
Japanese immigrant, he very often didn't understand the

00:28:52
names of the people. But also as a traveler, as

00:28:55
someone who most of the times were, it was in countries where

00:28:59
he didn't speak the language as well or didn't speak it at all.

00:29:02
So he asked people to write down their names.

00:29:05
And so he had, he found himself with papers with names of on

00:29:08
them. And he decided to make this

00:29:11
series based on that sort of, again, conventional relationship

00:29:19
with the self and with humanity and with experience, which is to

00:29:24
know the name of the person you're talking to.

00:29:26
Basically. The work is bureaucratic.

00:29:28
It's mobile as well, because he can make the work anywhere in

00:29:33
the world, in his hotel room, for example.

00:29:35
Even the paintings they are, they travel really easily and as

00:29:40
you said, they have full materials.

00:29:42
The material is not what makes the preciousness of the work,

00:29:46
let's say, unless you recognize, like you just did, that time and

00:29:50
space and place and experience are the most precious things you

00:29:53
have. These paintings, the date

00:29:56
paintings, which he did everywhere, I don't think they

00:30:01
know exactly in how many countries, but they counted more

00:30:06
than 100 cities. And you can know by the language

00:30:11
he's using. Then he's clearly worked in in

00:30:14
very many different places to do these paintings.

00:30:18
I think him and the Conceptualists really grasped, I

00:30:23
think, something of the times. So the in 1970 there was an

00:30:26
exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York called

00:30:29
Information, curated by Mcshine. And it's interesting because the

00:30:38
idea of information was in the exhibition related to

00:30:42
photography. There was this notion that

00:30:44
photography marked time and space.

00:30:47
It was indexical. And the whole exhibition was

00:30:50
about that. And we will talk about data

00:30:53
nowadays, right? There was this consciousness of

00:30:56
data. And because it was the first

00:30:58
computers, the artists were starting to look at technologies

00:31:02
as well and how those technologies in some ways

00:31:06
recorded the recorded existence and at the same time also

00:31:12
recorded a huge absence of what the, the sign or the symbol can

00:31:21
and cannot carry. So in I, you know, in the

00:31:24
exhibition, there's a, a piece by Douglas Hubler called

00:31:27
Location Piece just to kind of illustrate the fact that

00:31:31
Ankawara was certainly not the only artist thinking in terms of

00:31:35
place, location, time and space. So Douglas Hubler collected

00:31:40
newspaper photographs of local newspapers in several cities and

00:31:44
several places in the United States.

00:31:47
And the he chose the photos that only had local interests and

00:31:53
that reflected the space and the life of that space of that

00:31:57
particular place. And in his words, his work,

00:32:01
quote, shifts the image away from object hood, making the

00:32:04
recipient the subject of the work, UN quote, which could also

00:32:09
be applied to On Kowara. But in some ways, there's also

00:32:13
the stripping of subject hood in on Kowara on Kowara's work.

00:32:19
I find there's also kind of this nakedness of existence in in in

00:32:25
the work of on Kowara. And that comes this nakedness

00:32:29
you feel, I think that comes from his great humanity.

00:32:35
And as in all this project and series, there is attention and

00:32:41
an opposition with, like you say, information.

00:32:46
You know, that's why they did in that exhibition.

00:32:48
They took many photographs because this is reality.

00:32:50
Photograph is what you see opposite to something you create

00:32:54
from your brain and cuttings of newspaper is the reality of the

00:33:01
day and Ankara use that in the way he he puts his painting in

00:33:08
boxes with the cuttings of the day and the recording.

00:33:11
And that's all very precise by information or that data, as you

00:33:15
would say now. But Ankara use a very painful,

00:33:25
painful thinkingly method, which is very old fashioned.

00:33:32
He has his canvas, he will do the priming and then the first

00:33:37
layer and the second layers. And it's, it's very handmade.

00:33:42
And that creates a tension between, yes, the data, the

00:33:45
conceptual and the very human, the very artistic way.

00:33:50
Again and again you found that in all these series.

00:33:53
I cannot wait to go into the exhibition space and visit or

00:33:58
revisit the exhibition with you, Liberty.

00:34:01
So shall we go for a small break and when we come back.

00:34:07
The exhibition. Yes, absolutely.

00:34:09
Let's do that. See you in a bit.

00:34:25
OK, so we're back after a short break and we are about to be

00:34:31
taken by the hand by Liberty into the exhibition.

00:34:37
Great, then let's push the door of the gallery and visit the

00:34:41
exhibition. The exhibition was at David's

00:34:46
We're Not Gallery in Mayfair. The gallery is beautiful.

00:34:50
It's in the spacious Georgian townhouse in the heart of

00:34:53
Mayfair. Just to give you some context.

00:34:56
The space is very elegant with high ceilings, beautiful windows

00:35:02
covered with white linens. It's restored to perfection and

00:35:06
I would say that it's one of the most successful contemporary

00:35:10
space in London. Personally my favorite because

00:35:14
he has this white cube, but in an old townhouse.

00:35:18
It's just it's a great mix and it's a perfect vessel for On

00:35:23
Karawa and it's wide, it's clean and it's quiet.

00:35:28
Then what we are going to see in the exhibition is some painting

00:35:34
by On Karawa. They are all coming and that's

00:35:38
important. They are all coming from the

00:35:40
foundation 1 years and they've never been seen on the

00:35:44
market and they are for sale. Which is quite incredible, isn't

00:35:49
it? How do you go about buying?

00:35:53
How do you go about pricing? These works as well.

00:35:56
I read an article stating that there's a specific date painting

00:36:00
that went up. The price shot up, probably

00:36:04
because two people with a personal relationship with that

00:36:07
date were fighting for it. But what's really interesting is

00:36:10
that in the anecdote I recounted earlier, one of the jokes that

00:36:15
the friends would make when they would visit these collectors who

00:36:18
had the date painting in the living room was, oh, what is

00:36:21
this? Is this your birthday?

00:36:23
And they found it absolutely egregious.

00:36:26
They thought, why would it be my birthday?

00:36:28
But then I learned that some other people will go to the

00:36:32
dates for a personal reason. So it is interesting how you

00:36:38
enter this kind of word, but we're jumping the gun here.

00:36:42
We'll still not in the exhibit. We're still signing the book at

00:36:46
the entrance. So Di Bertie, go for it.

00:36:49
I'm so curious to know how you feel in front of these

00:36:53
paintings. So I'm only is.

00:36:55
Well, first it's you walk in the in the main room, which is on

00:36:59
the ground floor and what you see there is a lineup of five

00:37:07
grey painting dated on front 1966 with the June, July and

00:37:14
then the, the, the, the day and these these five paintings that

00:37:19
66 is important because this is the year on camera was started

00:37:24
these day paintings. And it's exactly on the 4th of

00:37:27
January 1966 that he did his first one.

00:37:29
And then he will continue that idea or that series for the next

00:37:34
5 decades, as we said, until one year before is dead.

00:37:40
The last one recorded is on December the 3rd, 2012 and it's

00:37:46
#1933 in the series. We might be missing some.

00:37:53
You know, it's, it's not complete perfect science.

00:37:57
Then when you walk in, they just want to show you, you know,

00:38:01
where it starts. And that's really the

00:38:03
cornerstone. And in that room, I don't know

00:38:08
you, but for me, when I walked in, the first thing I was

00:38:12
confronted is, yes, you see these squares paintings which

00:38:16
are monochrome with the date. And I was like, how does that

00:38:19
work? What's the system?

00:38:22
What does that mean? And I think I was really getting

00:38:26
into the nitty gritty of they don't have the same colors, they

00:38:30
don't have the same size. They are kind of the same, but

00:38:34
the writing is not really the same.

00:38:35
And and then my brain was getting into, I want to

00:38:39
understand what are the rules? What is he doing?

00:38:43
And that's kind of what happened to me downstairs and working

00:38:48
with you on the podcast. I've got so many answers, which

00:38:52
I will try to explain how he sets a rule and how that works.

00:38:57
And for me, this is downstairs. How is it for you?

00:39:01
Well, it's really well curated, isn't it?

00:39:03
Because as you enter, if you face a painting right away, so

00:39:07
you face a date. And I felt a physical sensation.

00:39:12
I felt a sort of slight punch in the stomach.

00:39:18
There's something about them, yeah.

00:39:24
Then you had the emotion. I did, yeah.

00:39:27
I don't know, Maybe I have a specific relationship with time

00:39:30
because in my kitchen I have a small set of cubes and

00:39:36
rectangles. Calendar.

00:39:39
Yeah, it's a calendar, wood calendar that you have to

00:39:41
manipulate yourself. So every morning I change one or

00:39:45
two cubes or the rectangle below that states the the month.

00:39:51
It doesn't have the year. And I love doing that.

00:39:54
It's the my, it's the first thing I do in the morning.

00:39:58
I go to the kitchen, have my breakfast, change the date and I

00:40:02
feel like I'm starting the day. I'm I'm I'm, I'm unlocking

00:40:08
another level of the video game, if if you will, and I love doing

00:40:13
that. It's your ritual.

00:40:15
It's my ritual and when I leave on holiday, no one else does it

00:40:18
in the house. So when I come back to the

00:40:20
house, yeah, I'm frozen in time. So I don't know.

00:40:24
And I that's it. You'll have this wooden thing

00:40:27
because it's so obsolete in a way, you know, we all have

00:40:30
phone, they update immediately, we have time everywhere.

00:40:34
But who? Who has a wooden calendar?

00:40:38
And who makes paintings with dates when you have at the time

00:40:43
you started having electronic devices that would tell you the

00:40:46
time and you can even call, I don't know if you remember that

00:40:50
you could call a line that would tell you the exact time of the

00:40:53
day. Do you remember?

00:40:54
That I do about the, the making of the paintings and how the

00:41:05
whole project works. Please bear with me.

00:41:07
It's a little bit technical, but not so much.

00:41:09
But it's very interesting, I think when you know, because

00:41:12
that gives you a very different reading.

00:41:15
Then when you walk in, you see all these painting which are the

00:41:18
same, but not quite the same because of course there is a

00:41:21
date, but also they vary a little bit with colors, with

00:41:26
everything. And then that gives a, it's not

00:41:29
really a constant that, that, that, that that gives some

00:41:32
variety to to the work. Then the way he does it, then a

00:41:37
date painting is a monochromatic painting on canvas.

00:41:41
He's using 3 colours only, grey, red and blue.

00:41:47
And then when he's done the background, the monochromatic

00:41:50
background, he will inscribe the date with some cherry font of

00:41:59
the day the painting was made and the date is done with a

00:42:03
ruler. He kind of calibrates it that it

00:42:06
sits in the middle. And then he will paint it in

00:42:10
with white paint. If the painting is not finished

00:42:15
by the end of the day, it will be destroyed.

00:42:17
There will be no painting with the date of that day.

00:42:21
With the colours he make them himself.

00:42:24
He will mix them. Then the the the most common

00:42:27
colour is the grey which is very very dark Gray.

00:42:31
It nearly on photos he can look black.

00:42:33
It looks black in photos, yes. And it was quite interesting

00:42:37
when I met one of your friend who was an artist we discussed,

00:42:41
I said, oh, what did you see? And you say, oh, I love the

00:42:44
colours. It was even 1 green.

00:42:46
It was like green. And then when we went back, it's

00:42:49
the screen. The the third one on this 1966

00:42:53
is kind of a very dark khaki tree green, but actually it's

00:42:58
Gray. And then I think it's just the

00:42:59
way mixed the the paint and then maybe the light of the gallery

00:43:03
and she really saw it as green, but it is not green.

00:43:06
But that gives you an idea of. There's a hue of green because

00:43:10
the thing that we discussed with the person who was there at the

00:43:13
gallery at the time is that when you have 3, three colors for

00:43:17
your paintings, they will change.

00:43:19
If you change brands, For example, if one of the brands

00:43:22
discontinues the color you use, it's going to affect and it's

00:43:26
going to you're going to have slight variations of the colors.

00:43:30
Yeah, and he's making, he's mixing the color every day.

00:43:34
And don't forget it is travelling.

00:43:36
And in a way it's, it's a way of meditation, you know, because it

00:43:40
will take a few hours to complete because in between if

00:43:43
you do layers, you do a two layers of ground, then you do

00:43:47
the colors you need the paint to dry in between.

00:43:51
And that's then there is a real craftsmanship.

00:43:55
And if you look at the painting very carefully, there is some

00:43:58
little bubbles, there is some little corrections.

00:44:01
They look very clean. There is a little accident which

00:44:05
makes which makes them very human.

00:44:08
The canvases they come in several sizes.

00:44:12
There are 8 possible sizes you can choose from on the day they

00:44:16
go from the small one which is 8 to 10 inches or the very large

00:44:21
one which will be 61 by 89 inches in the room.

00:44:26
The 1966 They are medium sized canvases.

00:44:31
They are 26 by 24 inches, which is about 60 sixty 70cm by 90

00:44:37
centimeters to give you an idea and they're always 5cm deep,

00:44:42
which is 2 inch, which gives especially on the small 1.

00:44:47
I don't know if you've noticed it gives an idea more of a more

00:44:51
of a box than of a painting. It's an object because I and I

00:44:55
didn't understand why when I saw the exhibition when I went back

00:45:00
and I noticed the 5 centimeters. That is why it's it's just more

00:45:05
physical than the usual canvases.

00:45:09
Yes, yeah, they have a real presence in space.

00:45:13
Then this painting he will build on the day.

00:45:17
He will build a box, a cardboard box where they go in when they

00:45:23
are not exhibited, and the cardboard box.

00:45:26
And that's where he gets very on Carawa and cereal.

00:45:29
He's blind with the newspaper of the day, and then he will give a

00:45:36
subtitle which is generally taken from that newspaper, which

00:45:41
you will write on the upper right corner you follow.

00:45:48
Yes, it's it's interesting because now I remember that when

00:45:52
you were there, you asked why they weren't shown with the

00:45:57
boxes. They they it's it's a curator if

00:46:01
you editorial choice here. They wanted to keep a very clean

00:46:05
look. I think it's only about the the

00:46:07
painting, but the paintings are going with the box, which are

00:46:09
going with the cutting and the subtitle.

00:46:11
And of course, this is all recorded in the book.

00:46:16
Of course, if he moves to another country, he will be in

00:46:20
the language of the country. And if if it's not an English,

00:46:28
no, if it's not a Latin alphabet based country like his own

00:46:34
country Japan, who has a, you know, has a.

00:46:37
Ideographic, yeah. Actually the if you take the

00:46:41
Arabic countries the E brilliant language then he will switch to

00:46:48
Esperanto which is invented language.

00:46:52
Did he speak Esperanto? I don't think so.

00:46:55
Who does eat today? A a few people there, there's

00:46:59
still that. There is still an ongoing

00:47:02
desire. Well it it does exist it hasn't

00:47:04
really take off. I think it was bigger before

00:47:08
then for the generation I was 4 kids.

00:47:12
Then The date is ever changing with the language and he has

00:47:19
always to write it in a way that it's very calibrated between the

00:47:25
left and the right. Then there is a real kind of

00:47:28
exercise of design in a way for each day.

00:47:34
And it has chosen the English language as kind of a base in

00:47:39
the Latin alphabet. And then the first time he's

00:47:41
using it is in 1963 with the painting, the names.

00:47:46
And then the painting is called something, and that's the first

00:47:49
time he's using English. And that's very interesting.

00:47:51
As a Japanese person, that is. That's his choice.

00:47:55
Also, when you think of the history of Japan, the bombing

00:47:59
and the American presence, and then suddenly he finds himself

00:48:02
in New York in a context that is so important to him in

00:48:08
conceptual terms and in artistic terms, that's one of those

00:48:13
ironies of history, I guess. Yeah, but that's an important

00:48:18
key. I think that the choice of the

00:48:20
of the language and in the in that ground floor you go in the

00:48:24
in the base kind of a side room where you have other paintings

00:48:28
and there we could find your favorite 1 and it was your

00:48:32
favorite because it says 20 space ABR in capital .68.

00:48:45
Then can you translate that for us and can you explain?

00:48:49
So, so my personal relationship with that painting is that

00:48:54
immediately I read it as Trinta dia Brionel of Sensistenta,

00:48:58
which is my language, Portuguese, like my mother

00:49:00
tongue. And it's interesting because

00:49:05
like my, that's, that's where my brain goes.

00:49:08
But it actually was produced in Mexico as far as I remember, and

00:49:12
it's Treinta de Avril de Milo a Ciento SE Centa.

00:49:15
So it's interesting because suddenly it kind of connects

00:49:19
the, the history of those two languages, the differences

00:49:23
between them. So they are linguistically very

00:49:27
close. And at the same time, when you

00:49:29
speak them as I just did, they are so different.

00:49:33
And I remember how excited you were like a kid because it's

00:49:36
your language were they were great dark grey and made on the

00:49:41
same day. Then that also shows you that

00:49:43
some days he doesn't do it, someday it does it that the

00:49:46
continuity and the exception, which I really like.

00:49:49
And I think that comes with if it's your date or the date of

00:49:53
someone you know and your colour and your language.

00:49:56
And that's very personal. And that's where from a very

00:49:59
conceptual dry project, you get something very, very personal.

00:50:04
And I love seeing you kind of reacting to that.

00:50:07
And then we did a selfie there and I was like, OK, that's

00:50:10
concept part. We go back to the making of it.

00:50:16
Then on the this painting will go in a box and then on the top,

00:50:21
this box will be lined with the newspaper of the place it will

00:50:27
be on. And he will choose what he calls

00:50:30
subtitle, which we will write at the top right corner in in the

00:50:35
book. And they are generally the title

00:50:38
is choosing either the main title of the day or they can be

00:50:43
about the weather. It's really about the news.

00:50:46
Sometime it's about him or his friends.

00:50:49
Then he can also go in his personal life.

00:50:51
It's, it's, it's rarer, I would say.

00:50:55
Then I'll give you a few examples of the titles.

00:50:59
Then one is 8 June 1966. Hurricane Alma has mounted to

00:51:05
100 miles an hour peak winds and he's moving towards Cuba. 22

00:51:11
July 1966 Russian specialists have developed the first live

00:51:17
vaccine against mumps. It can be either a long phrase,

00:51:21
it can be two words, it can be two sentences.

00:51:25
It really varies. And actually there is a podcast,

00:51:31
it's a couple and they just read the titles and the dates.

00:51:34
And it's very interesting because you are transported

00:51:37
directly. They read the date and then the

00:51:39
title, and then you're transported in 19, in the 60s.

00:51:44
They are timeless, but they are of the day.

00:51:47
And that's really reinforced by this cutting and this subtitle.

00:51:53
But it's funny because you start seeing time as LED these layers

00:51:56
and layers and layers of facts, feelings relating to those

00:52:01
facts, and how some things kind of come to the surface again,

00:52:07
like the Hurricanes. And the war and the politics,

00:52:10
when you hear that this, this this fun podcast, well, I found

00:52:14
it funny. It's the same of the same in a

00:52:16
way. And in 1972 in December is going

00:52:21
to drop the subtitles. Do you know why, Joanna?

00:52:24
No clue. OK, then a little bit like the

00:52:29
story with the stolen briefcase. He's in 1972 Ankara was an

00:52:37
artist in residence in the Moderna Museum in Stockholm.

00:52:42
And at the time that's there was some bombing in Vietnam by the

00:52:48
Americans and that was related in the newspaper.

00:52:51
And apparently he did some cut out of this major event and one

00:52:58
had the title Bomb Terror Hanoi, which is put in a folder and he

00:53:07
wrote about above that cutting yag vet inte which translates

00:53:13
from Swedish I do not know. And this is the type the

00:53:19
subtitles of 28th of December 1972.

00:53:24
I do not know in Swedish and from the 29th December 1972, the

00:53:31
subtitle just a day of the week, Friday and then Saturday and

00:53:40
Sunday. And that's from 72, no more

00:53:43
funny subtitle. It's only it kind of shrink

00:53:47
again. And that really reminds me of

00:53:49
the story you told us about when he was young.

00:53:52
I don't understand. I do not know.

00:53:55
Frozen in time is just blocking it.

00:53:58
It doesn't want to interpret it's thesis and the subtitle I I

00:54:03
giving a big clue here. It's funny because it's making

00:54:06
me think of the rawness of trauma with that generation.

00:54:11
You lived horrendous things. You went through horrible

00:54:16
hardships, but there's it's that generation, the pre boomers

00:54:22
almost because he was born before the Second World War.

00:54:24
You recompose your personality, you readjust and you keep on

00:54:31
going. And that's, there's something

00:54:33
really striking about that, this reduction of your experience to

00:54:44
a date and at the same time this death of your experience with

00:54:54
the date as well. There's this idea of death.

00:54:57
The dates always made me think of the idea of dying every day

00:55:02
and being born every day. And there's something to it that

00:55:08
I find very positive. And then there's something which

00:55:11
is akin to trauma and but also the positive and the negative

00:55:16
aspects of trauma as well. That kind of trauma connects you

00:55:20
to a raw, existential, almost delirious joy of being alive.

00:55:28
And at the same time, it's reminds you constantly of the

00:55:33
possibilities of hardship and death.

00:55:35
There's there's something really puzzling and hard to put into

00:55:40
words in in the work really and. You said he put it away, but in

00:55:46
a way he didn't because he became an artist.

00:55:50
And it's the whole, he's the whole life is dedicated to

00:55:56
overcome that trauma and and making something of it.

00:56:00
He's closing down the words. He doesn't want to explain, but

00:56:04
he does a painting a day and that's his meditation.

00:56:07
This is a turning the calendar. He's very positive he's

00:56:10
restarting every day no matter what.

00:56:13
Are you the one who is positive? We don't know if he was or not.

00:56:17
You, Liberty, are a very positive person.

00:56:21
Possibly. But you, you need, you know, you

00:56:24
need a little light every morning to start a new painting

00:56:29
every day. There's something about

00:56:32
dislocating the ego in in art practices at the time and taking

00:56:38
yourself out of the picture. And I realize that when I see

00:56:41
one of those paintings, I immediately think of him.

00:56:45
And so you do think of the crafts and you do think of the

00:56:48
patients, and you do think of the meditation, and you do think

00:56:52
of this idea of keeping time while laughing in its face.

00:56:58
It's this idea of containing within a very simple gesture a

00:57:02
sort of absurdity of, or contradictory or paradoxical

00:57:07
aspects of a moment in time. And so it is quite traditional

00:57:15
in terms of. Traditional.

00:57:17
Philosophy and very innovative at the same time, like the

00:57:21
Altamira caves. But I suggest now that we go on

00:57:26
the second floor. We're still see.

00:57:29
Imagine if we had talked in the exhibition.

00:57:32
We're so chatty. Let's go to the second floor and

00:57:35
and wrap it up. The Beautiful because we're in

00:57:39
our gallery, they have this fantastic restored staircase,

00:57:44
which is really staircase to heaven and that brings you on

00:57:48
the, the, the men most beautiful floor, which is a second floor

00:57:53
where there for me, it was a complete different emotional

00:58:00
story. When I I walk in the same 1 long

00:58:04
room and one room on the side you walk in and there is a whole

00:58:08
wall with a painting area, which means 10 paintings there.

00:58:16
Now I've got the system, then 1970, then 1971, then

00:58:22
197219731974, 1979. Then you move on the side and

00:58:30
there is a large blue painting which is very beautiful, 1982

00:58:34
and just on the side room where you can slide to, there's

00:58:39
another painting 1971 then on the next wall, 2000 and finally

00:58:45
2006. And for me, there I was totally

00:58:50
hit. It was like the ruthlessness of

00:58:53
time. Every you realize it just never

00:58:57
stops. It's like a rabbit hole.

00:59:00
It just goes on and on and on. And for me, the last painting,

00:59:04
when I looked at 2006, I just saw my death.

00:59:10
I was like, that's it. And my reaction was to rush back

00:59:17
and just say what's important? What do I have to do today?

00:59:21
Who am I just like really? And he was so emotional and I

00:59:26
was like, this guy is a genius. I know you hate the word genius

00:59:30
but it's he was from something quite technical on the 1st row

00:59:34
to a very, very meaningful, deep and emotional reaction which

00:59:41
really made me question myself. And for that, I'm so grateful to

00:59:45
on Karawa. What about you?

00:59:49
Well, I, it's funny because I had more of an impact downstairs

00:59:53
and the second floor for me was rushed.

00:59:58
There was an acceleration towards a time where I was

01:00:02
already here. Because that's the thing.

01:00:05
I think maybe the impact was also you're looking at a time

01:00:10
right before you were was like 10 years before I was born and

01:00:14
rather than bearing an image to make you.

01:00:17
To connect with you, to tell you a story.

01:00:19
It just has the time on it when it was made.

01:00:22
It's so reflected onto itself that it really places you after

01:00:28
that. So, but I think I, for me, the

01:00:31
paintings have more impact when they're isolated.

01:00:34
And that's why for me was more impactful downstairs, because

01:00:38
the calendar sense of things, pages of a calendar being leafed

01:00:44
through, it doesn't give me the same impact in a sense.

01:00:50
How different we are on that reaction.

01:00:52
Yeah. And look at at the at what

01:00:56
people buy. Of course, you know, if you have

01:01:00
the big painting, the colourful are, you know, we'll have a

01:01:03
premium, I guess. But the other thing which come

01:01:05
in big prices is when you buy them in groups as a decade.

01:01:11
So funny, and it's funny that you are buying chunks of time.

01:01:18
I just wanted to give a little anecdote about the whole meaning

01:01:23
of the exhibition. Then when I was waiting for you

01:01:26
on the bench, have a very civilized bench downstairs at

01:01:31
the as we are now, which is in the kind of in between places.

01:01:35
There was a visitor who asked a reception.

01:01:38
He said, is that it? Is there anything else to see?

01:01:45
I was like, who else do you want?

01:01:49
And I was like in that kind of trance about meaning of life.

01:01:54
And when the person say, is there anything else, then I'll

01:01:58
leave you on that note. But.

01:02:00
That's beautiful, is there anything else?

01:02:02
Lee Betty, thank you so much for doing this first episode as a Co

01:02:09
host. It has been wonderful and I hope

01:02:13
you come back. Thank you and thank you for

01:02:16
listening. Bye bye.