Artist studio secrets with A. Mercier and M. Roca Díe: MY ART TOOLS
ExhibitionistasOctober 03, 2025x
3
00:57:1652.43 MB

Artist studio secrets with A. Mercier and M. Roca Díe: MY ART TOOLS

In My Art Tools (new segment) we look into 2 artists' tool box: what is their fetish instrument? Artists think with their hands. Let's get technical! The artist's hand will guide you through the passion of following one’s vision, the pleasures of trusting an instinct, and the resilience it takes to work creatively. Hosted by Joana P. R. Neves.

The guests: Anouk Mercier (UK + FR) and Marina Roca Díe (SP).

In an endearingly geeky manner, the answers reveal fantastic methods and unimaginable stories. A big plus: hilarious little incidents and big misadventures that lead to a breakthrough, or a new possibility.

What you get from this episode: Have you ever thought about the stuff art is made of? Wondered how artists make what you see in museums and galleries? How they train their hand, eye, body? Artmaking revelations, art techniques, lessons in resilience, art philosophies, ethical questions.


→ ⁠SIGN UP TO THE EXHIBITIONISTAS FILES: ⁠⁠⁠https://joanaprneves.substack.com/s/exhibitionistas⁠⁠

You'll know all about the artists, backstage information and much much more. All the references in the episode are linked there too. Plus, you get to explore all my published texts.

→ DONATE (please leave some time for the donorbox icon to charge) ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://exhibitionistaspodcast.com/support-us⁠⁠

If you appreciate my work, why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice way to show your appreciation without having to commit to a membership: ⁠⁠⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/exhibitionista⁠⁠⁠

For behind the scenes clips, links to the artists and guests we cover, and visuals of the exhibitions we discuss follow us on Instagram: @exhibitionistas_podcast

Bluesky: @exhibitionistas.bsky.social

exhibitionistaspod@gmail.com


#contemporaryart #marinarocadie #howtomakeart #artexhibitions #anoukmercier #exhibitionistas #exhibitionistaspodcast #joanaprneves #artbook #artbookclub #bookclub #painting #contemporarypainting #londonart #museum #londonmuseum #artpodcast #artconversations #arttalk #talkart #greatwomenartists #spanishartist #drawing #museums #artisttalk #artpodcast #artgallery


00:00:01
Hello, I'm Joanna Pionevis, creator and host of exhibition

00:00:05
esters and this is the first episode of the segment My Art

00:00:09
Tools, where I take you to two artists studios by asking a

00:00:15
simple question which unexpectedly reveals quite a few

00:00:18
secrets and stories from the creative source itself.

00:00:23
And the sources in question are Anuk Mercier, an artist who is

00:00:27
now based in France, but has lived many years in the UK and

00:00:31
still teaches at UE Bristol. And Marina Rocardier, who is

00:00:37
based in Madrid and has currently, at the time of

00:00:41
recording and release of the episodes of the 3rd of October

00:00:44
2025, an exhibition at the El Chico Gallery in her hometown,

00:00:50
which we mentioned during the episode because the artists were

00:00:55
interviewed in their studios and show a few things to the camera.

00:00:59
This may be an episode you might want to watch on Spotify or

00:01:03
YouTube, but the audio experience works too.

00:01:07
If that's what you prefer, that's not a problem.

00:01:11
If you want to know more about the artists, I would recommend

00:01:14
going on Instagram and following exhibition esters, or even

00:01:18
better, signing up to the newsletter to learn more about

00:01:22
them and also to get the links and little gems that didn't make

00:01:26
it to the episode there. For those who may not know, the

00:01:30
exhibition Esters files are part of my page Joanna Pierre Nevis

00:01:34
on Sub Stack. And I don't send informative

00:01:38
newsletters because I really don't enjoy that.

00:01:42
And if I fill in your inbox and spend time promoting each

00:01:47
episode, it has to be for a better cause.

00:01:50
So by signing up, you get to access a different kind of

00:01:53
information. And also all of my texts and a

00:01:57
lot of other posts on Sub Stack that are not newsletters.

00:02:02
I don't have anything under a paywall and I'd love to keep it

00:02:06
that way. So donations are appreciated

00:02:09
either through the website, exhibitionistpodcast.com or Sub

00:02:13
Stack, or even Buy me a coffee. All those links are in the

00:02:17
show's notes. Or if you go to Sub Stack,

00:02:19
obviously you have the subscription button function at

00:02:24
the top of the screen. I think you'll find it.

00:02:28
Anyway, let's move on to the episode.

00:02:30
Allow me to plead my case. What if I told you that the

00:02:40
tools used by artists are absolutely fascinating and may

00:02:44
hold the key to an understanding of their work from within?

00:02:50
We create myths in art, right, Based on the images and

00:02:54
documents we have at hand. Pollock with the drip paintings,

00:02:58
for instance. But what if we looked closely at

00:03:02
other practices and gestures? What if we paid attention?

00:03:05
And also, what if you had someone who would bring these

00:03:09
informations to you? And that's what I'm here for.

00:03:13
Artists use unexpected tools or familiar ones in unexpected

00:03:18
ways. I'm not looking for the

00:03:20
spectacular here, although it might happen, but for the

00:03:24
sensible shift that suddenly opens a panoramic view on a work

00:03:30
of art or a whole body of work. But another thing that led me to

00:03:34
think more intentionally about this topic was an exhibition at

00:03:38
the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford dedicated to Raphael's drawings.

00:03:43
When I went there, I expected to see a few sketches, and indeed

00:03:48
the exhibition had exquisite works.

00:03:52
But there weren't only sketches or projects.

00:03:56
There were these sorts of screens, or what I now know to

00:04:02
be called cartoons, with holes on the outline of the figures.

00:04:07
And in fact, these cartoons are full size drawings used to

00:04:13
transfer the structure or the composition of the figure,

00:04:18
carefully tested and defined previously through drawing onto

00:04:24
a wall or onto whatever surface the painting is going to be on

00:04:30
by pouncing or tracing. So it means that those little

00:04:36
holes, they were intentional. They were there for a purpose.

00:04:40
The purpose was to then apply powdered charcoal or black chalk

00:04:46
on the drawing so that the little dots would be marked on

00:04:51
the surface to then be painted on.

00:04:56
There was a table there with a display of all the tools that

00:05:02
Raphael used. So when you think of painting,

00:05:05
when you think of drawing, you think of pencil, you think of

00:05:08
graphite, and you think of brushes and paints.

00:05:11
And what the display included were colored chalks and charcoal

00:05:16
metal points, which are rods of metal alloys, so gold, silver,

00:05:21
copper or leads and leads that left microscopic particles on

00:05:27
paper. And so the colour of the line

00:05:29
would depend on the composition of the rod, pen and ink.

00:05:35
He used the blind stylus, which was used to sort of try out

00:05:41
different shapes without marking the paper and the compass, so a

00:05:46
double pointed compass. So you can see there was a lot

00:05:49
of precision. None of this is in the catalog,

00:05:53
which I promptly bought because I really wanted to study that.

00:05:58
And in my research for the episode, I noticed that only two

00:06:02
articles mention in passing this display of tools in the

00:06:07
exhibition, enumerating what I just told you and not what I

00:06:13
have on my Instagram, because I took a picture of that display

00:06:17
and I looked it up. Now this was in 2017.

00:06:21
And then the picture I took, there's Reed pen and a fine

00:06:28
brush. So of course this is not to

00:06:32
criticize anyone here, but I do feel that we look at art more

00:06:38
like historians and less like Tekken.

00:06:41
Technologically savvy people with curious minds and who

00:06:46
actually know how to handle stuff and can very quickly put

00:06:50
ourselves in the minds of the people who are creating.

00:06:53
Historians are obsessed with timelines and influences, which

00:06:57
is funny to me, knowing how much artists lie about dates.

00:07:02
So the Renaissance after all. When I left that exhibition, I

00:07:06
thought associates imagination with science, chemistry with

00:07:11
observation. But mostly, how silly.

00:07:15
The myth of the artist painting from nothing and also to me at

00:07:20
least, how uninspiring it's. You know, it's as if everything

00:07:24
came from the inside, as if the artist didn't spend countless

00:07:27
times adjusting the material to the imaginations, but also

00:07:31
perhaps the imagination to the material.

00:07:35
The precision of the transfer and the care in using a double

00:07:39
pointed compass shows the importance of the final image,

00:07:44
the painting The Italian Renaissance feels to me more

00:07:49
cinema than free representation. It is more seductive than

00:07:53
inspirational. And it's closer, bear with me,

00:07:58
to the convincing power of deepfakes almost than the

00:08:01
compulsions of surrealism. Especially when you know how the

00:08:05
images are made, you look at them in a completely different

00:08:09
way. So Anuk and I talked precisely

00:08:13
about the playfulness of this dynamic between the tool and the

00:08:17
image, the project, the making, and the outcome, before she told

00:08:23
me what her favorite tool was. Drawing can be anything you have

00:08:28
at hand really. And so, you know, often that is,

00:08:33
you know, just buy her in a piece of paper or pencil, but it

00:08:36
can be other things. You know, you can be out walking

00:08:38
and it might be the soil under foot that you use with your

00:08:41
fingers and mark of recording, even if your favorite tool is a

00:08:44
graphite stick, is that the best tool for the project that you're

00:08:48
working on today? Is it the best tool to translate

00:08:51
the, you know, the object or the scene that you want to record?

00:08:55
So I would say in terms of teaching, actually my approach

00:08:59
is the opposite to having a favorite tool.

00:09:02
Sometimes you have an idea and that is the foremost, you know,

00:09:06
that's the first thing, that's the starting point.

00:09:08
And then the tool you, you know, is there to support the idea and

00:09:12
to make it come to life. But sometimes a tool will

00:09:17
inspire an idea or will drive you towards a certain direction,

00:09:23
which is why, again, if we talk in terms of teaching, but also

00:09:26
applied to the studio practice playing is so important.

00:09:30
Because if you only rely on ideas and you know, using tools

00:09:37
to to make those ideas come true, you might actually miss

00:09:40
out on something that is experimental that you wouldn't

00:09:43
have planned. That really only stems from

00:09:47
playing practice. It shows my fountain pain.

00:09:51
And I think it's because it's very difficult to find the right

00:09:54
one. There are thousands of them and

00:09:57
it's a pretty expensive material, expensive tool.

00:10:01
My husband, he gave it to me from a trip.

00:10:06
He, well, I used to live in Berlin and then from a trip he

00:10:09
did in Madrid, he went to the flea market here.

00:10:13
And if you search for it, you will find this like stands with

00:10:19
like really vintage boxes of thousands of these.

00:10:24
And they are pretty, pretty cheap for what you can pay in

00:10:29
the store. So he he was able to buy, I

00:10:32
don't know, 5 or 6 for me to try them.

00:10:36
And this is my favorite 1. So first of all, the looks, it's

00:10:40
like a steelo pen, like black. It's plastic.

00:10:43
Actually, I think it's like embedded like it's metal

00:10:48
embedded into the plastic, which is a bit strange, you know, but

00:10:51
it gives it like this look like this vintage look.

00:10:54
So I I really like this one because of the strength of the

00:10:59
point, you know, like sometimes you have to yeah, the tip

00:11:04
sometimes bench for calligraphy are too hard for drawing.

00:11:09
Like you can feel like the paper is scratching, you know, like

00:11:15
like this feeling and that I don't like.

00:11:18
I like it to have some flexibility in the tip.

00:11:20
While ink is not so important for Marina, Anuk's choice is

00:11:25
surprising as it is as much a tool as it is a material, but it

00:11:30
has another component to it. Raphael could not have used it.

00:11:35
As opposed to marinas fountain pen, which is very very close to

00:11:41
the Renaissance materials, Anuk's choice of tool, which is

00:11:48
also in some ways a material, is completely dependent upon 20th

00:11:54
century technology of the machine.

00:11:56
When you when you asked me this question, I thought immediately

00:12:00
about toner. I always thought that it was

00:12:02
just carbon powder, which is what it is.

00:12:05
But yesterday, because I was like, I'd better double check

00:12:08
that I'm right about this, I found out that it's actually

00:12:13
these tiny particles of plastic coated in carbon powder.

00:12:18
So I did not know that. So basically this we're talking

00:12:24
about toner. So this is, you know, the toner,

00:12:26
Carter, is that all of us have in in, you know, in used at some

00:12:30
point. They're in most photocopiers.

00:12:32
If you've been to what really any type of education, they are

00:12:36
basically these little plastic particles coated in carbon

00:12:40
powder that are then applied to paper using laser technology and

00:12:49
there's an electric charge involved as well.

00:12:52
And then it's burnt onto the paper.

00:12:55
So the like the plastic particles melt and literally,

00:12:59
you know, sort of cement the carbon powder onto the paper.

00:13:03
So tono is literally those that carbon dust for many, many years

00:13:08
I have used it and I never referenced it.

00:13:12
So, you know, when people ask you, you know, whatever to list

00:13:17
the materials of an artwork. For years, toner did not

00:13:20
feature. I would just say acetone

00:13:22
transfer, which is a transfer method that I used with acetone.

00:13:27
And basically what happens in this transfer technique is that

00:13:33
I use a toner photocopier. I apply the acetone to the back

00:13:38
of the photocopy. The acetone repels the carbon

00:13:42
powder and reprints it. So it transfers it back onto

00:13:46
another piece of paper. So essentially it takes that

00:13:50
carbon dust that's all over my my initial photocopy and it

00:13:56
repels it and pushes the little particles onto the next piece of

00:13:59
paper. Everything started from having

00:14:01
an idea from, you know, 18th century landscapes and etchings

00:14:07
in particular, being my, you know, predominant source of

00:14:10
inspiration, let's say, and wanting to appropriate those

00:14:14
references into my work. I remember this does not happen

00:14:17
anymore because of health and safety.

00:14:18
But when I was an art student on my foundation course, one way of

00:14:23
introducing students very quickly to the notions of

00:14:26
printmaking was to do acetone transfers.

00:14:29
So I remembered that, you know, years ago, Foundation, I had

00:14:33
tried this technique. I loved how immediate it was.

00:14:35
You've got the photocopy, you transfer it and you know, 2

00:14:38
seconds later you have your transfers.

00:14:40
But it really came from, I had an image, I needed to transfer

00:14:44
it. How do I do it?

00:14:45
Go to the photocopy machine, photocopy, transfer and move on.

00:14:50
And I think there's also something to do with photocopies

00:14:54
are so familiar to all of us. They were very unprecious.

00:14:58
We're not that far from the intricate processes that Raphael

00:15:02
and other artists of the Renaissance used to work on

00:15:08
their shapes, to copy them, to transfer them onto drawings,

00:15:13
from drawings and then to the final piece.

00:15:17
We're not that far away from a sort of a mechanic handling of

00:15:22
the shape through a very, very trained hand.

00:15:26
The artists of the Renaissance used mechanical copy of drawings

00:15:34
that they were satisfied with, and why waste time making them

00:15:39
over and over again? And why not keep them?

00:15:43
And perhaps once they're transferred on to the final

00:15:48
piece, maybe change them a little bit.

00:15:51
And something to note as well is that that technique, you know,

00:15:55
the pouncing technique, breaking little holes on an outline was

00:16:00
used for tapestries, for example, to reproduce patterns

00:16:05
of tapestries and other crafts. So there is also.

00:16:09
This tension in the technique that is used to make.

00:16:13
What we call, perhaps with a sense of grandeur, masterpieces.

00:16:17
So in some ways it's really interesting to use 20th century

00:16:23
tools in order to look at what was done in the past, play the

00:16:29
anachronic game, and try to assess what we try to obtain

00:16:35
through these tools that seem so distant and yet kind of produce

00:16:41
the same thing, which is to extract images that already

00:16:48
exist in order to make new ones. And so that really affects the

00:16:53
idea we have of creation and of image making from a an artistic

00:17:00
point of view, not from an entertainment point of view or

00:17:03
from from a publicity and advertisement point of view, but

00:17:07
really this area, this field of intense creativity, imagination,

00:17:13
but also science and research and purpose and intentional

00:17:21
experimentation. When looking at the work of both

00:17:26
artists, you would not imagine the technical challenges that

00:17:30
they both have, nor the physical engagement with the process.

00:17:34
My first kind of, you know, Commission, which was to create

00:17:40
an artwork for Bristol Museum. I basically, you know, I

00:17:44
proposed my whole idea for the Commission, which would

00:17:47
basically be to photocopy images from their collections to bring

00:17:54
their collection back to life through a new artwork, which is,

00:17:58
you know, a, a way of working which I adore, like plunging

00:18:02
into history and looking at collection and, and, and really

00:18:06
finding ways for the, you know, contemporary audiences to re

00:18:09
engage with those, you know, artworks and artists and

00:18:13
narratives. So, you know, it was really

00:18:16
exciting for me to get an opportunity to work with a

00:18:18
museum on this so I could pitch to my idea.

00:18:23
And everyone agreed, Move forward was very excited.

00:18:26
And at the time, even though I graduated, I did all my

00:18:29
photocopying at the UE library. So I would sneak back in, even

00:18:35
though I wasn't really allowed to, and I would photocopy, you

00:18:39
know, and yes, apologies to UE if they're listening to this,

00:18:44
this, I guess, you know, it sounds kind of crazy, but to me,

00:18:47
an hour and a half of photocopying images is

00:18:50
comparable to a painter going to an art shop and buying tubs of

00:18:54
painting. It was my primary source

00:18:57
material, right? And you can still see behind me.

00:19:00
This is how I do. So I do lots of photocopies.

00:19:02
Then I put them up on the wall. So I see the images and then

00:19:04
I'll select areas of them, cut them out and then transfer them.

00:19:08
And on this occasion, which felt to me like the most important

00:19:11
time, you know, finally had a Commission for a museum, I got

00:19:17
to the library, did all my photocopying, go back to the

00:19:20
studio, sat down, started to make and it didn't work.

00:19:25
It just didn't work. So the photocopies that I had

00:19:30
made, I did everything as usual, used the acetone and nothing

00:19:35
happened. So obviously utter panic.

00:19:39
And then I spent a day going around Bristol in all different

00:19:43
shops doing different photocopies to see if it was the

00:19:45
photocopier that was different. And all of, you know, just tried

00:19:49
lots of different things and I, I just couldn't make it work

00:19:52
anymore. I ended up actually contacting

00:19:55
the photocopying machine producers, I can't remember who

00:20:00
it was. And a very helpful person

00:20:02
explained to me. That it's because the technology

00:20:05
was advancing and they were now burning the toner and so burning

00:20:12
the carbon powder at much higher temperatures onto the paper,

00:20:16
which to them was great because I don't know if you remember

00:20:20
this from holding for copious you used to have black fingers

00:20:23
afterwards and that was the toner powder coming off on your

00:20:26
hands. So for them, increasing the

00:20:29
temperature meant there was no more staining of fingers, but it

00:20:33
also more durable, you know, just better quality all around.

00:20:37
So basically he said to me, you know, we're going around

00:20:40
replacing all of the photocopiers so that now they

00:20:43
burn at much high temperature. So your technique isn't going to

00:20:46
work anymore. The only way to resolve this is

00:20:48
that I then did lots of research, spoke to the guys at,

00:20:54
you know, the various printer companies, printer

00:20:57
manufacturers, and identified a model that still use toner at

00:21:02
the temperature I needed. And I bought the photocopier and

00:21:06
it's in my studio and I still have it today.

00:21:09
And they still luckily make those toner cartridges further

00:21:12
for that photocopier. All this to say, I am so not a

00:21:17
geeky person. This makes me sound like, you

00:21:19
know, I'm really into understanding technology and

00:21:21
actually I'm really not that kind of person.

00:21:23
But the technology I was using has forced me to become a bit of

00:21:28
a photocopier geek and a toner geek.

00:21:32
And from that day on, I started listing toner as a medium

00:21:38
because I was like, it's a very real thing.

00:21:41
Drawing is a much more complex affair when it comes to tools,

00:21:44
but also the body, or perhaps I should say when it comes to the

00:21:48
relation between the body and whatever is used to make the

00:21:53
image or the final artwork. I have a lot of anxiety with

00:21:59
with my hands, you know, like I am all the time like needing to

00:22:03
do something. Like if I'm in a bar, I'm like

00:22:07
squeezing a little napkin or like a piece of paper or like

00:22:11
doing something while I talk. And yeah, and it's very common

00:22:16
that I am touching the lid while I'm drawing.

00:22:20
So for me, drawing is something of like, it's an activity

00:22:24
related with this, right? Drawing in a way, there are no

00:22:28
mistakes. But at the beginning when you

00:22:30
Start learning, there's a lot of mistakes, you know, so you learn

00:22:34
to spot them and to really realize if you want to keep them

00:22:39
or not, you know, and in a ways like beforehand.

00:22:42
So I would say a mistake in a drawing done now for me would be

00:22:52
that is like out of composition for like for me, composition is

00:22:55
like, is my, is my problem, You know, because I think, yeah, I,

00:23:01
I tend to be very expansive. And so I, I approach too much to

00:23:06
the borders. Sometimes I, I don't leave space

00:23:10
to continue, you know, like I just like, I expand and expand.

00:23:16
I would need more paper, but then like, but the paper is

00:23:19
limited. That's like what constitutes

00:23:21
A-frame. Like you have to assume the

00:23:23
frame before you start. It's a rule.

00:23:25
It's a rule from the substance of the material you're using.

00:23:30
It's like like you cannot assume an infinite frame like an

00:23:36
infinite paper. Like you have to assume the

00:23:39
borders of the paper because then at some point you get out

00:23:42
of the paper, you know, like you're painting on the table at

00:23:47
some point. So it's like it's a given, I

00:23:49
think. And, but it's more like the

00:23:53
relationship with the thing I'm drawing.

00:23:55
Like for example, if I'm planning to draw a figure in a

00:23:59
landscape and then I start to, with the fountain pain, I start

00:24:04
from, I don't know the head of the figure.

00:24:06
Normally I do it too big, then the landscape is not fitting in.

00:24:12
That's my problem. I would need more paper around

00:24:16
and then I would expand the drawing and then I would add

00:24:18
more paper around and spend the drawing and more paper.

00:24:21
And then it's like it's impossible.

00:24:23
Like no, no, you have to contain it.

00:24:25
Like it's important. The frame is the most important,

00:24:29
you know, And with drawing, I think it's more this fact is

00:24:35
very obvious in the sense that for me, a drawing is something

00:24:40
like the paper is just a support.

00:24:43
But you could actually remove that support and put a black one

00:24:48
or a yellow one and another any other color, any other coloring

00:24:52
of paper. And you could still rise up the

00:24:55
drawing like as if it was like a wire, you know, in I want a

00:25:01
void. But it's also like it's a, it's

00:25:03
a way of seeing, you know, like with your eyes.

00:25:06
It's a way of using your eyes while you're drawing.

00:25:09
I think it's a yeah, Yeah. Like drawing has that like this

00:25:13
flattening of reality and then you the paper is assumed.

00:25:18
But it could be any other paper or any other material, or it

00:25:21
could be a wall, or it could be directly the frame, and then you

00:25:26
draw on a board of the frame. I'm a painter.

00:25:30
I'm a Flat Earth, you know, like the frame is the paint is the

00:25:34
painting. Damn it.

00:25:40
No, of course I'm joking, but it's for me the painting is a

00:25:49
frame actually. That's like the frame of

00:25:52
reference, like on the format. That's also why my exhibition

00:25:56
now that is like an installation instead of just white cube and

00:26:00
paintings on top. Because in a way I think every

00:26:05
painter or every draft man needs to assume the frame, but this

00:26:11
also desire to get out of the frame.

00:26:13
And so for me, like the effect of the white cube on on

00:26:18
paintings in a painting exhibition is the same as the

00:26:22
effect of the paper on a drawing.

00:26:25
It's just the support. And you assume it, you don't

00:26:28
think about it. And it could be another 1 you

00:26:30
could change, exchange it for another one, you know.

00:26:36
So what I'm doing is like covering the whole all walls and

00:26:40
like braking on the white cube. Yeah.

00:26:44
And then I'm putting the paintings on top of that.

00:26:49
It felt constrained and smothering, this need to conform

00:26:53
to a size of a AER and the shape of the canvas, until I

00:26:57
understood that it is part of the game.

00:27:00
It's like a game of cards whose combinations are incredibly vast

00:27:04
but contained by the rules of a game, which reduces the

00:27:07
possibilities but makes it far more enjoyable because it allows

00:27:13
you to have an effect on the outcome and also to let the

00:27:17
outcome effects you. Marina's exhibition at the El

00:27:22
Chico Gallery in Madrid is an all over installation where the

00:27:26
walls are completely covered with a painting with brown tree

00:27:30
trunks and a deep dark blue sky on one side and on the other a

00:27:35
brown red crepuscular atmosphere as if going from the beginning

00:27:40
to the end of the day. The floor is also painted in a

00:27:45
deep but sort of luminous blue with darker lines like rings in

00:27:49
a body of water, and there are also paintings on the floor.

00:27:55
Marina mentioned the reference to the history and fictional

00:27:59
narratives that we carry. But working from prints and

00:28:02
somehow stealing them, what impact does her technique and

00:28:07
Nuke's technique have on the past, how we see it and current

00:28:13
stories? What is drawing, then, if it is

00:28:17
so vast a field that it extends to engraving, photocopying,

00:28:23
performing a sort of discipline to actually see through the

00:28:28
hand? It's like a slow thinking

00:28:30
drawings, like thinking very slow.

00:28:33
You know, like, you wander around a page and sometimes,

00:28:39
like, for the kind of drawing that I do, which is like

00:28:42
expressionist, expressionist, material expressionist drawing,

00:28:47
sometimes people tend to believe that it's like because it's

00:28:50
gestural, it means it's fast, but it's not fast necessarily.

00:28:56
You know, why Fountain pain. Actually, yeah.

00:28:58
Maybe it has to do with some kind of tradition where you

00:29:02
learn. I don't know, but you know what

00:29:05
I mean. Yeah.

00:29:06
So The thing is that when I learn how to draw, it was

00:29:10
important that you couldn't correct the drones with this.

00:29:14
Like, you cannot erase it and make it back right again, you

00:29:20
know what I mean? So you could learn what was

00:29:24
wrong about the drawing. And so it has something very

00:29:29
emancipatory for me in this sense of like once the line is

00:29:34
done, it's done. That's it.

00:29:35
There's no correction. And it's very beautiful in the

00:29:38
sense of a practice is a kind of performative aspect.

00:29:45
Like once it's done, it's done. So that's it.

00:29:49
So you commit to the line and that's beautiful.

00:29:53
And then sometimes they are shitty drawings, you know,

00:29:55
that's also fine. Like you don't need to share

00:29:58
them all. You don't need.

00:29:59
Like, you can destroy them, that's fine.

00:30:02
Just calmly destroy them. I destroyed many drawings.

00:30:06
I had many, many bad ideas, you know, that didn't work.

00:30:10
I'm curious about the situations where the tools used come to us

00:30:15
unexpectedly and enter the studio or a particular project,

00:30:20
and this at the most unexpected of times.

00:30:26
My this is before we had children and Max was not my

00:30:30
husband, he was my partner. But he said to me you're working

00:30:33
too much, I have to take you away for a weekend to Wales.

00:30:36
And honestly it was a very busy time and I was like very

00:30:40
reluctant to go. And I was like, oh, I just want

00:30:42
to be in my studio. So he took me to this tiny

00:30:45
village in Wales, can't remember what it's called.

00:30:46
There was nothing there. And I entered this holiday, sell

00:30:50
imposed holiday quite reluctantly to be honest with

00:30:52
you. But anyway, when we were there

00:30:55
walking in this tiny town, there was this tiny shop cafe thing

00:30:59
and they had this tiny section with like 2 shelves and on there

00:31:03
with some art materials. And you know, I looked of course

00:31:07
and I found this, this pen which was really like a felt it brush

00:31:12
felt it. But this beautiful pen that came

00:31:15
from Japan, I have no idea why this tiny shop in Wales was

00:31:19
selling this pen. No idea.

00:31:22
Anyway, I picked it up and spent this little weekend drawing in

00:31:26
my sketchbook. And that went on to me starting

00:31:29
drawing with ink and experimenting with different

00:31:31
brushes. And I guess that's an example of

00:31:35
a time where it was really an object of material that led, you

00:31:40
know, to ideas within my practice and in a completely

00:31:44
unexpected, unlooked for kind of way.

00:31:48
And I think the lesson I learned from that holiday was that it's

00:31:51
actually good to get out because sometimes, you know, you're

00:31:54
exposed to influences you would never have expected, or you

00:31:57
encounter material you've never, you know, encountered before.

00:32:00
Well The thing is I did still end up drawing all weekends.

00:32:03
The joy of finding a new thing to work with is also the joy of

00:32:08
developing a new project, which is precisely what happened with

00:32:13
Marina. You can think about a drawing

00:32:17
that then you can exhibit or sell or just put it hanging

00:32:22
some, somewhere or like a drawing as an object.

00:32:27
And you can think of drawing as a as a, a thought to arrive to

00:32:33
something else. So like I've been, I've done

00:32:37
thousands and thousands of drawings in my life.

00:32:40
Bible is called a Bible for Lilith.

00:32:42
I can show you, but I have to, I have to go for it.

00:32:46
Just give me a SEC. It's very exciting to show the

00:32:56
Bible because I it's a very difficult object to show,

00:33:01
actually to exhibit, because how can you exhibit this?

00:33:05
But the the thing with this object that it started as a

00:33:09
mistake, as a failure in a way. Like my boyfriend said, it would

00:33:16
be great to have a sketchbook that pages are two things so I

00:33:22
can trace like I can see the next page.

00:33:28
So I thought, ah, for his birthday, I'm going to find like

00:33:31
this Bible paper that is so thin.

00:33:34
I'm going to find a book that is blank paper, but it's like this

00:33:38
Bible paper. So we can see what he has drawn

00:33:43
on the the prior drawing, you know, so you can see through.

00:33:47
And so I bought it for him as a present.

00:33:51
And then it was like super long because it came from China.

00:33:56
And by the time he received the present, he didn't remember this

00:34:00
idea anymore. So where he got it, he was like

00:34:03
a Bible. What the fuck are you giving

00:34:06
that? Like why?

00:34:07
You know, it's like, and then he was like so stupid because he

00:34:11
was coming from China. It got stopped at customs.

00:34:16
So then I we had to like cross the whole Berlin to pick this

00:34:20
shit up and then when he opened it like, Oh my present finally,

00:34:25
like, I don't know like 2 months delay of his birthday or

00:34:28
whatever, then he was like a pipe.

00:34:31
Why? You know, so it's just like, OK,

00:34:34
forget the so stupid, stupid, very stupid.

00:34:42
Like it turned completely. Ridiculous.

00:34:43
This that was for you. It was not fair.

00:34:46
Yeah, and aware of it. I I bought it for myself.

00:34:50
But anyways, I kept it in any case, anyways, that doesn't

00:34:57
matter. What matters is that I get it.

00:35:01
And it's like almost 500 drawings.

00:35:06
Yeah. So I spent a couple of years

00:35:09
doing this, you know, it has like, a golden spine, you know,

00:35:17
all these little thingies. It's a real Bible, you know.

00:35:22
And then I started, OK, I'm going to do some erotic drawings

00:35:25
here because, like, ha, ha, I'm very radical.

00:35:28
Whatever. And then at some point you

00:35:30
realize that you have to commit or you don't continue, you know,

00:35:34
but like at some point you decide if you are going to

00:35:37
really do 500 drawings or really no.

00:35:40
And then you stop now. But you know, but like to leave

00:35:44
it half is shit. So just like when did you commit

00:35:48
it or not? And I did, I committed.

00:35:53
Yeah. And so.

00:35:54
Yeah. So The thing is that like it

00:35:57
started, you know, you can see a bit of development.

00:36:00
OK, So Lilith is like the first woman of the Bible.

00:36:05
So in the Bible, like there is a sentence at the beginning of the

00:36:09
Genesis saying God grabs I, I don't know, I'm very phrasing,

00:36:14
of course, but God grab a piece of lamp, a lamp of clay and then

00:36:19
cut it in half. And then he was like creating

00:36:22
woman and a man. Because this is like pre

00:36:25
biblical texts, like Lily, this pre biblical texts.

00:36:32
So in like this, like versions, like Jewish versions of the

00:36:36
Genesis, some versions of the Bible kept this sentence, this

00:36:39
like very mysterious sentence, but it's like God created the

00:36:47
human bites image and look or something like that.

00:36:52
Female and male, he created them.

00:36:55
And then, yeah. So that that was the first idea

00:36:58
was like grab a lamp of clay, you cut it in half, you have a

00:37:04
woman and you have man. And then this man was Saddam,

00:37:08
this woman was Lilith, and Lilith was a rebel and she

00:37:14
wanted to fuck with on top. You know, it's that's what it

00:37:21
says in the stories to lead sex activity.

00:37:25
And Adam wanted to have a missionary position like a

00:37:30
regular. He wanted to be on top.

00:37:31
She wanted to be on top too. So they they have a fight of

00:37:36
power because Adam wants her to be a bit minor and then she

00:37:42
wants to be equal. So she runs away from heaven,

00:37:47
you know, from paradise, which is very funny.

00:37:50
It's a funny thing. Like she runs away from

00:37:52
paradise. Wasn't it the the best place to

00:37:56
be? It was like the best place to

00:37:58
be. No, she didn't want to be there.

00:38:01
Exactly. And so she runs away and she

00:38:06
goes to the Red Sea, and then she she starts to live there and

00:38:12
there's like a bunch of demons and she fucks them all.

00:38:15
And then she has tons of babies. They say.

00:38:19
Like, she has 100 babies a day. That's what it says in the

00:38:23
story. Yeah, she has something.

00:38:30
And so. So Adam gets bored and he tries

00:38:34
to confraternize with animals. That's what it says.

00:38:37
Really. I'm not with animals, with the

00:38:40
animals around to see if he can like get along and he of course,

00:38:46
he cannot find the comfort. And so he asked God to bring her

00:38:51
back. God sends for angels, I think,

00:38:57
to bring her back and then just go to to the Red Sea to bring

00:39:01
Lily back. She's super busy.

00:39:03
She moved on. She doesn't give a fuck about

00:39:05
Adam anymore. And then the the angels come to

00:39:09
pick her up and she's like, fuck you.

00:39:11
I'm not going, you know, I'm staying here.

00:39:14
So the the story says that the angels, they as a revenge, they

00:39:21
kill all her kids. And then because God cannot find

00:39:26
a solution for Lily to come back to the paradise, then she like

00:39:32
he thinks that OK, then let's make a woman but out of your

00:39:37
body. So it's a bit of a minor from

00:39:39
the birth. And then he creates Eva.

00:39:42
Time and dedication to a project come with the type of final

00:39:47
outcome 1 ends up creating. But if we invert this logic, it

00:39:52
may as well be that Marina found the state of completion which

00:39:56
could apply to such a no mistake kind of work.

00:40:01
On the other hand, her interest in the erotic, the body and sex

00:40:06
also found a place where it could exist.

00:40:08
I feel the responsibility of, yeah, I think it, I think art

00:40:13
can be very ethical or unethical because sex is a very, very

00:40:21
delicate subject indeed, because it's also like it can be very

00:40:26
aggressive for many, many people.

00:40:28
And you are making it visible and it's something that is

00:40:32
supposed to be in the intimate sphere, right?

00:40:37
And so, but then at the same time, because it's in the

00:40:42
intimate sphere, like for many decades it hasn't been talked

00:40:46
about. And then that has led many

00:40:49
people to dangerous situations because of lack of sex

00:40:54
education. But then at the same time, if

00:40:56
you're drawing it, you are like making it visible for everyone

00:40:59
to see. And that's very, it's so So

00:41:03
yeah, I'm responsible for that. And I understand too, you know,

00:41:08
like it can be highly pleasurable and highly dangerous

00:41:13
for many people. And at the same time also, you

00:41:16
know, like some like there is some connection between pleasure

00:41:19
and pain. I think that's interesting.

00:41:21
But then at the same time, I also understand that there are

00:41:24
some channels where you shouldn't be able to show sex

00:41:29
because you, you know, I don't want to be scrolling down

00:41:31
Instagram and then all of a sudden find an addiction like

00:41:34
boom on like a porno image. I don't want that either, you

00:41:38
know, like it has to be, it's very aggressive, you know, like

00:41:43
I'm not in the mood. Like why you're not asking about

00:41:46
it? Time for a short break to let

00:41:51
you into the exhibitionist studio.

00:41:54
Look around you. There is a computer, a good mic,

00:41:59
the software in the computer, which is a sort of virtual space

00:42:05
through which you and I meet with a time and space delay.

00:42:10
Then there are my books and two perfectly round Flintstones.

00:42:15
All the magic happens here. I've been talking to a

00:42:19
university whose students need placements and I could use some

00:42:24
assistance with production and research while also mentoring

00:42:30
the future professionals of the field.

00:42:34
But for that I have to pay them. And that's where you come in.

00:42:39
Do you know how much a membership costs?

00:42:43
A mere £25 a year. Which means that you pay £2 a

00:42:49
month, 25 lbs for a whole year when you buy a catalog.

00:42:56
That's the average price for one single book with two texts.

00:43:02
If you become a member of Exhibition Esters through a

00:43:05
platform called Sub Stack, you not only get to support

00:43:10
Exhibition Esters, but you also receive on average about 18 more

00:43:15
texts minimum that I will have written about many, many, many

00:43:21
fascinating topics of contemporary arts, philosophy of

00:43:25
art, and many other subjects. There's a little bonus that I

00:43:31
added, which is getting to ask me questions.

00:43:34
I'm very, very happy to do the research for you or to dig into

00:43:39
my little well of knowledge and put the information out there

00:43:43
for you. I can name you or you can be

00:43:46
anonymous, so you get to put me to work as long as the questions

00:43:51
and the prompts you give me within my abilities and the

00:43:57
research material available to me.

00:44:00
Otherwise, you can go to donor books in the description notes.

00:44:04
You can just donate one time, very, very small amounts.

00:44:09
That's what I do with Wikipedia once in a while.

00:44:12
I put some money in there because I use it almost daily

00:44:16
and I want to reward people who nourish me.

00:44:20
Thank you for spending some time with me here in my studio.

00:44:24
Thank you for considering this decent proposal.

00:44:28
On with the episode. This question of control,

00:44:33
controlling the space where images are, who sees them and

00:44:36
where, reverts back also to the freedom of creating and the

00:44:41
discipline of release and tension in creative processes.

00:44:45
Imagination must flow, but technique must shape it,

00:44:49
although not too much. Ideas must preside, but perhaps

00:44:54
not on the conscious level. Stories are present, but are

00:44:59
they at the start or at the end of the final outcome?

00:45:04
If you put some acetone onto a photocopier and you push it

00:45:07
around, you start seeing the pigments moving like dust.

00:45:11
So you can make little piles of dust or move it around.

00:45:15
And what I love about that is that it meets at that point

00:45:21
graphite, which is the other thing that I use and the other

00:45:25
tool that I use. And it means especially now

00:45:30
recently favorite castle has I've got them here, has created

00:45:35
these pit graphite mats so that they're making graphite pencils

00:45:39
now that don't reflect. So if you color with them,

00:45:42
they're very, very matte. My pencil a choice.

00:45:45
But these so this is very reflective.

00:45:47
This is not and basically these new pencils with toner carbon

00:45:54
powder, It's, it looks and feels like the same thing and now I

00:45:59
can blend them seamlessly. It's kind of like taking my work

00:46:03
in a slightly different, well, little bit of a different

00:46:07
direction because I can now rework photocopies and images

00:46:10
and you can't tell that I've reworked them because the

00:46:14
graphite, this graphite is very much like the carbon powder.

00:46:18
Part of why I find this process interesting because I am

00:46:21
actually taking, you know, prints mainly etchings really as

00:46:28
a reap. So basically reproduction on so

00:46:30
many levels. There is the original etching

00:46:34
that has been reproduced itself several times, usually to, you

00:46:38
know, to make additions. And then they have been

00:46:41
reproduced in art books. I have the arcs.

00:46:44
I then reproduce the reproductions of the

00:46:46
reproductions through a photocopier.

00:46:49
And what I'm interested in as well is the dilution of the

00:46:53
image through that process of reproduction.

00:46:57
And when you reproduce images, you know, in the final stages of

00:47:01
my stage on a photocopier, it is further diluted because

00:47:05
actually, you know, the photocopies transfer more or

00:47:08
less well. So some of them get distressed

00:47:11
or, you know, slightly damaged. But also, this is where the

00:47:16
acetone part is interesting because depending on many

00:47:21
factors, the acetone moves like transfers the toner, more or

00:47:27
less. So I had another moment of like,

00:47:29
oh, my goodness, it's not working.

00:47:30
Why? Because so I, I, you know, I

00:47:33
have moved to France partly because I have now a house with

00:47:36
a big barn that's going to be a great studio and we're working

00:47:39
on it. But for now it's very much an

00:47:42
empty barn with no heating. And, and last winter, you know,

00:47:46
me, I was like out there with my, you know, duffel coat making

00:47:50
and my transfers were not working.

00:47:53
And I was like, no, why are they not working?

00:47:57
Yeah, I know, not this again. And in the end I realized I came

00:48:03
to the conclusion after trying lots of different things that it

00:48:06
was actually that it was the acetone that's at a lower

00:48:10
temperature, basically under 10° acetone doesn't really work as

00:48:13
well. So the toner to transfer the

00:48:16
acetone needs to work be strong and it needs to be more than

00:48:18
10°, so. So all this to say that you know

00:48:23
when I am transferring the photocopies the image gets

00:48:28
altered and factors like the temperature on the day, the you

00:48:33
know how, how diluted or not the acetone is, what brush I use as

00:48:39
well, how hard I press. All of these things influence

00:48:43
the transfer of the image and to an extent over many years.

00:48:48
Now I control this. So I know if I use this type of

00:48:53
pressure on this type of image, photocopied at this, because you

00:48:58
know, on a photocopier you can alter how light or dark the

00:49:01
photocopy comes out. So I also play with this.

00:49:03
I've also always done very, very nearly hyper realistic graphite

00:49:08
drawings. So that's all about control, all

00:49:11
about control. This aspect, in contrast, the

00:49:14
fact that I can never thoroughly control, even though I've tried

00:49:18
for years, I never have control over the final transfer, is

00:49:22
actually a huge needing like a relief to me.

00:49:24
It makes the making exciting because I'm going to respond to

00:49:28
the transfer. Sometimes it does something I'd

00:49:31
never anticipated before. And then those marks, the

00:49:33
transfers, which I then draw over, they will inform the

00:49:38
drawing to an extent. So I'm responding to the

00:49:41
unpredictability of the transfer.

00:49:44
And I love that way of working. It's for me, it feels very

00:49:47
liberating. I would say, you know, that half

00:49:51
of my practice is, is too tight. And I think like, you know, when

00:49:55
drawings are too stiff or too in invertedcom is perfect or

00:50:00
trying, you know, hyper realism. I mean, this is not a criticism

00:50:03
of hyper realism. You know, I need to work that

00:50:06
way because it's partly how I learned to draw.

00:50:08
When I observe something really, really intensely, I understand

00:50:13
it. So for me, it's a necessary

00:50:16
exercise that I really enjoy the the drawing, you know, really

00:50:20
realistically, but it's extremely tight.

00:50:24
And I always, when I went that way, I'm always thinking, you

00:50:29
know, that's great. But actually you need to loosen

00:50:31
up. You need to let you know, I

00:50:34
always think of art in a scientific way.

00:50:36
You need space for experimentation because it's

00:50:39
when you experiment or you play that things you hadn't thought

00:50:42
about the car or you know, where you kind of get into that flow

00:50:46
state, sort of like, you know, things come to you, etcetera.

00:50:49
So all this to say that if tomorrow my photocopier breaks

00:50:54
down and that's it, I know that I would be already and I have

00:50:59
already started looking for another technique, method that

00:51:04
brings that element of unpredictability in in in the

00:51:09
transfer or in the way it works. I think an important part of the

00:51:13
process for me is thinking about how, you know, that whole

00:51:16
precious side of art making, especially in Europe, that the

00:51:20
etchings, you know, they're, they're like really laborious

00:51:24
art making techniques. And people thought I should try

00:51:27
etching and I might like it, but I actually didn't because it's

00:51:29
so like tight and, and laborious.

00:51:31
And I think, you know, there was this whole thing about these

00:51:35
like master print makers, you know, of the 18th century and

00:51:40
this kind of reverence to print. And I adore those artists.

00:51:45
I adore their prints. But a big part of the way I'm

00:51:49
working now and with a photocopier is being able to be

00:51:52
playful about those references, those images and those

00:51:56
techniques. And I think one of the, the main

00:51:59
things, and I've no answer to this, but that always kind of

00:52:02
results from, from this relationship that I have is

00:52:05
whether people think my work is print or not, because it's not

00:52:09
print in the sense there isn't this, you know, people will say,

00:52:12
but there's not that labor intensive side of it.

00:52:15
So I'm just transferring an image now.

00:52:17
I started referencing the artist whose work I'm appropriating so

00:52:20
that people know it's a deliberate wanted collaboration.

00:52:23
Not that I'm trying to kind of, you know, and also to bring that

00:52:26
artist, you know, to to new audiences.

00:52:29
I suppose realize that all the reference material that I have,

00:52:32
it's all male artists. And so I've been wanting to use

00:52:35
female print makers. When you are a female printer,

00:52:38
because it's like you are like carrying the weight of all the

00:52:41
tradition made by mail. I try and draw every day, even

00:52:47
after my kids are in bed or, or you know, and having those two

00:52:50
ways of working has allowed me to keep making at all times.

00:52:55
But it was already something I did anyway.

00:52:56
But it's been reinforced by, you know, having to keep making in

00:53:00
that sense. I think Jordan teaches you to

00:53:03
really see. It's hard to explain to people

00:53:06
what seeing really truly is. But you know, for example, you

00:53:10
know, go and draw water. And then when you look at water,

00:53:12
you will never see it the same way you see it in kind of areas

00:53:16
of light and dark, broken up movement.

00:53:18
And it just adds a lay. I don't know, I feel like I see

00:53:22
the world more intensely. If you study something and you

00:53:25
draw it, you then you know, it's like on a daily basis, even if

00:53:28
I'm not drawing from observation, when I look at

00:53:30
things, I feel like you know, you're, you're always sort of

00:53:33
deconstructing and trying to understand what you're actually

00:53:37
like seeing. It was fascinating listening to

00:53:40
such different artists with different experiences of

00:53:43
drawing, art making and exhibition spaces.

00:53:47
I'm surprised to see how observational drawing for them

00:53:51
is linked with seeing and how it pervades their day-to-day life.

00:53:58
What I mean by that, it's obviously if you observe and you

00:54:01
draw, it has to do with seeing, but there is a real dynamic

00:54:06
between having drawn and then seeing the world in a completely

00:54:11
different way. I connected a lot with Anuk,

00:54:16
saying that even when she's going about her life, she is

00:54:20
indeed seeing the world through potential drawings.

00:54:25
I'm always writing a story in my head, taking mental notes and

00:54:29
recording little segments. Recently, I spoke with a

00:54:32
multimedia artist who told me that his drawings didn't

00:54:36
translate his music or vice versa.

00:54:39
His notations, they came with it.

00:54:42
The more we expand our experiences and the arts, the

00:54:47
more we've carried and carry a wider and richer form of

00:54:51
engagement which we take to our lives and our actions.

00:54:55
Perhaps it doesn't make us better people, probably, but it

00:54:59
certainly seems to make us more disposed to engage with the

00:55:02
world, to wander and to be curious.

00:55:06
As for the characteristics of 21st century arts as opposed to

00:55:10
Raphael's time, I hope I brought some proximity between them

00:55:15
rather than radically separating them.

00:55:19
If you think about it, nothing has changed much since the caves

00:55:25
in. Here we are and what we take

00:55:27
from our technologies. As ever, it's a game of push and

00:55:31
pull, with perhaps now a more acute awareness of the danger in

00:55:37
the use of certain materials and the overpowering presence that

00:55:42
they have on the planets. Would this be the reason why

00:55:46
Marina and Anuke focus on the landscape and stories of the

00:55:50
past while subtly making them hybrid and near it?

00:55:54
And ambivalence? What I don't know what to make

00:55:58
of is the writing spectre that in a sense haunts their work.

00:56:04
It's probably just me projecting my own language onto their art,

00:56:08
but it did seem that the photocopier and the fountain pen

00:56:12
have that memory of the written and the distributed word.

00:56:16
What do you think? This is it.

00:56:20
I hope you enjoyed this new segment as much as I enjoyed

00:56:25
editing it, preparing it, researching it, and particularly

00:56:28
talking to the two artists, Anuk Mercier and Marina Roca DA, who

00:56:35
were so, so generous with their time.

00:56:38
And you are there. I hope you took something from

00:56:42
it. I'm really curious to know what

00:56:44
you thought of this episode. So leave a comment, send an

00:56:47
e-mail, sign up for the newsletter, follow us on

00:56:50
Instagram. There's so many ways to reach us

00:56:54
and to make suggestions. Tell us what you thought and

00:56:58
perhaps also share a few ideas that you may have had while

00:57:03
listening to the episode. Take care.

00:57:06
Have a good one. I'll see you in a couple of

00:57:08
weeks with another brand new episode.

00:57:12
Take Care.